ArticleScientific reports2026
Explainable machine learning with bayesian hyper-optimization for predicting cognitive impairment from longitudinal nursing home data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The monitoring of daily life in nursing home residents generates diverse and heterogeneous sources of information. Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to predict a wide range of outcomes in both research and clinical practice, including mortality and cognitive impairment (CI). A key challenge is determining which information sources (IS) provide the most accurate predictions. In this work, we present an integrative AI-based framework that combines harmonized temporal modeling, Bayesian hyperparameter optimization, XGBoost, and explainable AI (SHAP) to predict CI in nursing home residents using 13 years of heterogeneous longitudinal data from 2,608 individuals. Our approach enables interpretable predictions of CI-related clinical scales such as the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Global Deterioration Scale (GDS), and the Barthel Scale while revealing the relative contributions of diverse IS, including clinical metrics and activity records. Using a nested 5 × 3 cross-validation scheme with patient-level grouping and temporal blocking, the Bayesian-optimized XGBoost regressors achieved robust predictive performance, with MSE values of 2.12 (MMSE), 0.47 (GDS), and 4.55 (Barthel) when using only Clinical Variables, and further improvements when integrating all information sources (MMSE: 1.85; GDS: 0.42; Barthel: 4.30). The MMSE severity classifier achieved a macro-averaged AUC of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.87-0.91), with the highest F1-scores in the Normal (0.80) and Severe (0.86) impairment categories. Clinical Variables consistently emerged as the most informative source across regression and classification tasks. Overall, this integrative framework enhances CI prediction from heterogeneous long-term care data while providing interpretable insights that may support more personalized and data-informed care strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.