Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41645123›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2026

Public health policies and interventions to address health inequities in high-income countries: an umbrella review.

Jatinder Hayre, Ellie Canning, Helen Pearce, Raj Khera, John Ford

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jatinder HayreWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. Jatinder.Hayre1@NHS.Net.
Ellie CanningNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.
Helen PearceWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Raj KheraSt. Georges University of London, London, UK.
John FordWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth inequity: defined as systematic and avoidable difference in health outcome, remain entrenched across high-income countries, with socioeconomic gaps in life expectancy exceeding 7–10 years. Upstream interventions addressing the social determinants of health are critical. This umbrella review evaluates which macro-level policies and public health interventions most effectively reduce health inequity.

methodsWe conducted an umbrella review of systematic reviews. Four databases (Embase, Medline, Scopus, Cochrane) were searched from May 2017, the date of the last umbrella review on the subject, to September 2024. Eligible reviews reported population-level interventions in OECD countries, with outcomes stratified by socioeconomic status or related disadvantage. Included systematic reviews were appraised using AMSTAR II. We devised a conceptual Health Equity Pyramid that classified interventions by their agentic demand and population reach.

resultsThirty-five systematic reviews were included. This review evaluated evidence across six policy domains. Redistributive and welfare interventions, including cash transfers, basic income and food subsidies, consistently improved food security, household financial stability and maternal–child health outcomes. Legislative and regulatory measures, such as smoke-free policies and pharmaceutical subsidy reforms, demonstrated robust population-level gains, particularly in disadvantaged groups. Community and housing interventions improved psychological health, reduced morbidity and mortality in targeted populations, and enhanced housing stability. Health system interventions, notably tailored smoking cessation and hospital discharge coordination for people experiencing homelessness, were effective in narrowing disparities. By contrast, educational and behavioural programmes and telehealth interventions often demanded high individual agency; without contextual tailoring, may exacerbate intervention-generated inequality.

conclusionsThis umbrella review demonstrates that interventions characterised by low agentic demand: welfare reform, housing support, and legislative measures; yield the most consistent reductions in inequity. High agentic interventions can be effective when carefully tailored to disadvantaged populations but may otherwise exacerbate disparities. Future policy should prioritise structural, population-level strategies to achieve sustainable equity in health outcomes.

trial registrationCRD42024529176.

Indexed as

Developed CountriesHealth InequitiesHealth PolicyHumansSocioeconomic Disparities in HealthSystematic Reviews as TopicHealth inequitiesHealth system interventionsHousing and community interventionsIntervention-Generated inequalityLegislative measuresPublic health policyRedistributive interventionsSocial determinants of healthTelehealthUmbrella review

Identifiers

PMID41645123
PMCPMC12874971

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.