ArticleBMC health services research2026
Health care epidemiology, characteristics, and regional variation of chiropractic care in Switzerland: a descriptive study using insurance claims data.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMusculoskeletal disorders are a leading cause of disability and major driver of health care costs in Switzerland. Since chiropractors are musculoskeletal health care providers in this setting, we aimed to describe the health care epidemiology, characteristics, and regional variation of chiropractic care in Switzerland.
methodWe conducted a retrospective descriptive study using administrative health insurance claims data of all ages from Helsana. Chiropractic care incidence cases were persons with first occurrence of chiropractic care in two study index years, 2018 and 2019. Chiropractic care prevalence cases had any chiropractic care over a 24-month prevalence period. We estimated (i) crude, (ii) sex-, age-, and region- standardised 12-month cumulative incidence, and (iii) 24-month prevalence of chiropractic care per 100,000 population. We characterised four mutually exclusive chiropractic care incidence subgroups based on additional health care use eight weeks before or after the index visit. Regional variation was visualised with choropleth maps.
resultsAmong 1,137,904 and 1,196,760 persons with Helsana health insurance in 2018 and 2019, 17,148 (mean age 48.7 [SD, 18.4] years; 9,717 [56.7%] women) and 18,261 (mean age 48.2 [SD, 18.2] years; 10,421 [57.0%] women) persons had a chiropractic care incidence visit, respectively. The crude 12-month chiropractic care incidence was estimated at 1,507 (95% CI, 1,485 to 1,530) and 1,526 (1,504 to 1,548) cases per 100,000 in 2018 and 2019, respectively. Sex-, age-, and region-standardised incidence estimates were comparable to crude estimates. The 24-month prevalence of chiropractic care was estimated at 3,135 (3,105 to 3,166) per 100,000 population. The chiropractic case subgroup with the highest health care use had more comprehensive insurance models with lower deductibles. Incidence of chiropractic care varied across regions with the lowest incidence observed in Ticino and the highest in Espace Mittelland and Zurich.
conclusionsThe incidence and prevalence of chiropractic care utilisation in Switzerland in 2018 and 2019 were markedly low. Chiropractic care subgroups differed in their characteristics, and incidence estimates varied across major regions. Further studies on the predictors and causes of chiropractic care underutilisation are warranted to inform accessible and equitable musculoskeletal and rehabilitation health services in Switzerland.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.