ArticleBMC medical education2026
Knowledge, attitudes, and skills towards evidence-based medicine among Palestinian undergraduate medical students: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvidence-based medicine (EBM) has been increasingly emphasized within undergraduate medical education; however, its implementation remains inconsistent across many low- and middle-income countries. In Palestine, restricted access to scientific resources, inconsistent mentorship, and limited institutional funding and support may have affected students’ competencies in EBM. This study evaluated the knowledge, attitudes, skills, and information-seeking behaviours related to EBM among undergraduate medical students in the West Bank.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted between 14 September 2025 and 1 November 2025, among second to sixth-year medical undergraduates at five Palestinian universities. The questionnaire was distributed through convenience sampling and included five sections: demographics, information-seeking behaviours, EBM knowledge, skills, and students’ attitudes towards it. Analyses were performed using Jamovi 2.6.44 statistical package.
resultsA total of 709 students participated, with a mean age of 21.3 years, of whom 37% had trained in EBM. Practical workshops were the most preferred learning modality (31%), while medical books were the most frequently used source of information (83.6%). Regarding search engines, PubMed, Google and Google scholar were the most accessed. Attendance at biostatistics or research methodology courses was significantly associated with prior EBM training. Overall, students showed positive attitudes towards EBM, and average self-rated skills. However mean score for each skill was significantly higher in EBM-trained undergraduates compared to non-trained peers (p value < 0.001). Understanding of EBM-related terms varied, with participants being more familiar with basic terms than advanced terms, such as heterogeneity, and number needed to treat (NNT), and prior EBM training was consistently associated with higher knowledge scores for key terms. As for research barriers, the majority reported limited access to paid databases, limited funding, and inconsistent mentorship.
conclusionPalestinian medical students held positive stance towards evidence-based medicine, recognizing its clinical value. However, their skills and terminology knowledge were still somehow limited. Integrating EBM training into curriculum, enhancing faculty support, and expanding access to resources can strengthen students’ competency and prepare them for evidence-based clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.