Evidence mapPaperPMID 41645239Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2026

Healthy school recognized campus: design and methodology of a hybrid type 2 implementation-effectiveness cluster randomized trial.

Allyson Schaefers, Cassandra M Beattie, Gabrielli T de Mello, Alisha George, Kendra Marstall, Julie Gardner, Jacob Szeszulski

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07079995 (Healthy School Recognized Campus), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07079995 narecruitingnot on this map

Healthy School Recognized Campus: A Hybrid Type 2 Implementation-Effectiveness Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorTexas A&M UniversityRan2025 to 2028Enrolled900ConditionsCardiovascular Diseases, Physical Activity, NutritionArmsMentoring program, Waitlist
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Allyson SchaefersInstitute for Advancing Health Through Agriculture (IHA), Texas A&M AgriLife Research, 17360 Coit Rd, Dallas, TX, 75252, USA.
Cassandra M BeattieInstitute for Advancing Health Through Agriculture (IHA), Texas A&M AgriLife Research, 17360 Coit Rd, Dallas, TX, 75252, USA.
Gabrielli T de MelloInstitute for Advancing Health Through Agriculture (IHA), Texas A&M AgriLife Research, 17360 Coit Rd, Dallas, TX, 75252, USA.
Alisha GeorgeInstitute for Advancing Health Through Agriculture (IHA), Texas A&M AgriLife Research, 17360 Coit Rd, Dallas, TX, 75252, USA.
Kendra MarstallInstitute for Advancing Health Through Agriculture (IHA), Texas A&M AgriLife Research, 17360 Coit Rd, Dallas, TX, 75252, USA.
Julie GardnerTexas 4-H Youth Development, Texas A&M AgriLife Extension, 1470 William D Fitch Parkway, College Station, TX, 77845, USA.
Jacob SzeszulskiInstitute for Advancing Health Through Agriculture (IHA), Texas A&M AgriLife Research, 17360 Coit Rd, Dallas, TX, 75252, USA. Jacob.Szeszulski@agnet.tamu.edu.

Funding

American Heart Association 25ISA1473973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAbout one-third of U.S. youth are overweight and most have at least one risk factor that increases their chance of developing cardiovascular or other chronic diseases. School- and research-based physical activity and healthy eating programs can reduce obesity and improve health outcomes; however, schools face many implementation challenges. Healthy School Recognized Campus (HSRC) bundles school- and researched-based programs to improve their implementation and student health outcomes. This paper describes the protocol for a hybrid type 2 implementation-effectiveness, cluster dual randomized controlled trial that evaluates the (aim 1) effectiveness of the HSRC initiative for improving health behaviors and (aim 2) the impact of an implementation strategy - school-to-school mentoring - on HSRC's delivery.

methodsStudents in 4th through 9th grade (n = 500) at public schools (n = 20) across East and Central Texas will be randomized at the school level to determine the effectiveness of HSRC (vs. waitlist control condition) on BMI z-score (primary outcome), physical activity measured via accelerometer, and skin carotenoids (i.e., fruit and vegetable intake; secondary outcomes). Assessments will occur at the start and end of one school year. Program implementers (n = 200) at schools will be randomized to assess the impact of the school-to-school mentoring strategy (vs. standard implementation) on HSRC's acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility (co-primary outcomes). Assessments will occur at the start, middle, and end of one school year. The assessment at the end of the school year will also include a concurrent mixed-methods approach (QUAL + QUAN), guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), to evaluate the school-to-school mentoring strategy. For quantitative outcomes, a generalized linear model framework will be used to evaluate HSRC and the school-to-school mentoring strategy. DISCUSSION: This study's innovative dual randomized design allows for rigorous assessment of HSRC on effectiveness outcomes and the evaluation of a school-to-school mentoring implementation strategy on implementation outcomes. If both HSRC and the school-to-school mentoring strategy have their hypothesized effect, we will be well positioned to address cardiovascular and other chronic disease risk factors among youth using a scalable, widely used approach within one of the largest health educator networks in the country.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov on July 1, 2025 (NCT07079995).

Indexed as

Health PromotionSchool Health ServicesAdolescentChildDiet, HealthyExerciseFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansImplementation ScienceMaleMentoringProgram EvaluationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignSchoolsAdolescent healthBody mass indexCooperative extensionExerciseHealth educationImplementation strategyNutritionObesity

Identifiers

PMID41645239
PMCPMC12977675

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.