ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026
Evidence-based informed consent forms for total knee arthroplasty and anaesthesia: development and pilot study.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInformed consent is a legal and ethical prerequisite for elective procedures such as total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, standard informed consent forms often lack evidence-based content and do not adequately support informed decision-making. The aim was to develop and pilot test an evidence-based informed consent form for TKA.
methodsWe conducted a two-phase study. In Phase 1, we developed an extended, evidence-based informed consent form for TKA, as well as a corresponding form for anaesthesia, based on systematic evidence syntheses, expert reviews, and standards outlined in the Guideline Evidence-based Health Information. We also developed an e-learning program to train clinicians in the appropriate use of informed consent forms. In addition, we developed a multiple-choice test to assess patients' knowledge and risk perception. In Phase 2, we piloted the informed consent forms with potential patients through think-aloud interviews and focus groups, assessing their acceptability, usability and comprehensibility with iterative revisions. The multiple-choice test was also piloted and revised. Qualitative data were analysed using qualitative content analysis.
resultsWe developed evidence-based informed consent forms for TKA and anaesthesia. Content and risk communication follow the Guideline Evidence-based Health Information and meet legal requirements under German law. Benefits and complications were presented using natural frequencies and visualised with bar charts. The forms were piloted in six think-aloud and three focus group interviews with 17 participants. Feedback from participants and experts highlighted the need for revisions in the presentation of numerical data, terminology, structure and layout, which were addressed iteratively. Overall, the forms were rated as understandable, relevant and helpful, though individual information needs varied. The 12-item multiple-choice knowledge test was revised to improve clarity and was perceived as comprehensible and applicable. The e-learning programme includes videos, texts and interactive elements, and is designed for flexible use over 90 to 180 min.
conclusionsThe informed consent forms are now available. Evidence-based informed consent forms are feasible and perceived by patients as helpful and understandable. The variety of patients' information needs underlines the need for personalised counselling and structural adjustments in clinical practice so that the potential of evidence-based informed consent forms can be exploited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.