ArticleESMO gastrointestinal oncology2025
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma trends and treatment lines: real-world evidence from the French National Hospital Discharge database.
Article in ESMO gastrointestinal oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Survival outcomes and prognostic factors inFrontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Little is known about the therapeutic trajectory of patients treated in hospitals for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) and patterns of care in daily clinical practice. Patients and methods: An observational retrospective study was conducted on the French National Hospital Discharge Database. All patients with a new diagnosis of iCCA who had a first hospital stay (S1) from January 2016 to December 2021 were included. They were followed up until December 2021, or in-hospital death, whichever occurred first. Crude annual hospitalization rates were computed. Treatment lines were identified with an artificial intelligence algorithm [Analysis of Treatment Lines using Alignment of Sequences (ATLAS)]. A multistate model was used to compute the transition rates between lines. Results: Overall, 13 491 patients were included and the mean (standard deviation) follow-up duration was 13.1 months (17.9 months). The median age at S1 was 72.0 years and 55.9% were male. Nearly 20.7% were admitted via emergency services for S1, and 32.1% had metastases. Between 2016 and 2021, the crude annual rate of new iCCA cases increased from 3.08 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.94-3.24] in 2016 ( Conclusions: This study provides up-to-date national real-world data on iCCA, revealing an increasing burden year by year in France, a poor outcome of patients with iCCA on L1 systemic therapy, and the low proportion of patients receiving an L2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.