ArticleResearch square2026
Male partner involvement in pregnant and breastfeeding women's use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in a low-income setting in South Africa.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
HIV in South Africa remains highly gendered, with women experiencing nearly twice the burden of men. Pregnant and breastfeeding women (PBFW) face elevated HIV acquisition risk, and incident maternal HIV infection during these periods increases the likelihood of vertical HIV transmission. Male partners play a critical role in supporting PBFW to initiate and persist on oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), yet limited evidence exists on how best to foster partner support. We conducted in-depth interviews with male partners of PBFW enrolled in a randomized trial (SCOPE-PP) that offered real-time biofeedback counselling on PrEP adherence and access to HIV self-testing (HIVST) in both study arms. Eligible male partners of participants in the intervention arm were invited to participate in November-December 2024. A thematic approach explored men's perceptions of and support for their partners' PrEP use. We completed sixteen interviews. Median relationship length was six years; four partners were married to the index participant. All PBFW were taking PrEP at the time of the interview. Men generally held positive views of PrEP, describing it as protective for both mother and infant. Many provided emotional encouragement or practical support. Open communication helped resolve initial mistrust or gendered assumptions that women's PrEP use signaled suspicion of male infidelity. Exposure to PrEP also prompted men to reflect on their own HIV prevention needs. Findings underscore the value of approaches that center communication within couples to strengthen disclosure and male engagement in PrEP uptake and adherence during the perinatal period and to promote shared responsibility for HIV prevention within families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.