ArticleResearch square2026
Plasma p-tau217, p-tau181, and Aβ42 Predicts Amyloid PET Positivity in Cognitively Unimpaired Adults.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Early detection of Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology in cognitively unimpaired individuals is critical for preclinical intervention. Plasma biomarkers, especially phosphorylated tau217 (p-tau217), are promising predictors of amyloid-β (Aβ) accumulation. Methods: In this cohort study, we analyzed data from cognitively unimpaired older adults in the A4 and LEARN studies (n=1,407), comprising 452 participants with Aβ positron emission tomography (PET)-negative status and 955 participants with Aβ PET-positive status. We evaluated the accuracy of plasma biomarkers (p-tau217, p-tau181, Aβ42/40 ratio, and others) in predicting Aβ PET positivity using receiver operating characteristic analysis, comparing models with biomarkers alone versus those combined with covariates (age, sex, apolipoprotein E [APOE] ε4 genotype). Results: Plasma p-tau217 showed the strongest individual association with Aβ PET status (area under the curve [AUC] 0.85). A combined model integrating p-tau217, p-tau181, Aβ42, age, sex, and APOE ε4 achieved the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.87), significantly outperforming individual biomarkers. Conclusions: Plasma p-tau217, particularly when combined with other biomarkers and clinical covariates, provides a robust method for predicting Aβ PET positivity in cognitively unimpaired older adults. This biomarker profile could enhance preclinical trial screening by identifying individuals likely to harbor Aβ pathology, potentially reducing the need for confirmatory PET scans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.