ArticleResearch square2026
Creation of an Implementation Blueprint for the National Emergency Airway Registry for Pediatric Emergency Medicine (NEAR4PEM) Pre-Intubation Checklist.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The National Emergency Airway Registry for Pediatric Emergency Medicine (NEAR4PEM) developed an evidence-based pre-intubation checklist, however its successful integration to clinical practice in the Pediatric Emergency Department (PED) requires attention to implementation. Given the complex conditions influencing checklist use, it is essential to work with key informants to understand multilevel determinants and identify the most effective strategies for implementation. The objective of this study was to systematically identify barriers to checklist adoption and to prioritize and detail targeted strategies as an implementation blueprint to support successful checklist integration into clinical practice. Methods: NEAR4PEM recruited Airway Champion (AC) teams composed of physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and respiratory therapists at each PED. Our methodology consisted of a five-step modified conjoint analysis. In Step 1, a mixed-methods formative evaluation was conducted, utilizing focus groups and surveys for identification of barriers and facilitators to checklist implementation. In Step 2, key informants prioritized the identified barriers according to feasibility and impact quantitatively via survey. In Step 3, the prioritized barriers were matched with implementation strategies from a published compilation (Expert Recommendations for Implementation Change, ERIC) via virtual facilitated sessions. In Step 4, these strategies were ranked for feasibility and impact by Advisory Board (AB) members. In step 5, the AB detailed the prioritized implementation strategies in an implementation blueprint. Results: In Step 1, ACs from 13 sites completed 45 surveys, which, together with focus groups, identified 16 unique barriers. For Step 2, these key informants prioritized 6 barriers of high impact and high feasibility. For Step 3, an implementation science team assisted ACs with selection of 24 ERIC strategies. In Steps 4 and 5, the AB prioritized 19 ERIC strategies and incorporated them into an implementation blueprint, detailing how each could be applied across different phases to guide future airway teams. Conclusions: An implementation blueprint for a PED pre-intubation checklist was collaboratively developed with interprofessional AC team members and implementation scientists. This blueprint includes a manageable set of prioritized barriers and detailed strategies to navigate the implementation process. Future steps involve implementation of the checklist with concurrent evaluation of implementation and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.