ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Aligning Artificial Intelligence Prediction Targets with Clinical Workflows Using Human Centered Design Methods.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence models in healthcare often fail to improve patient outcomes despite strong predictive performance because they are frequently developed with limited understanding of clinical workflows and system implementation. We demonstrate a human-centered design approach to define prediction targets before model development, ensuring alignment with actionable clinical interventions. Using pediatric acute kidney injury as a case study, we convened a multidisciplinary working group and applied three complementary methods: user stories to elicit role-specific prediction targets, a People, Environment, Technology, and Tasks (PETT) Scan to analyze sociotechnical system factors, and process mapping to identify workflow leverage points. This approach revealed that different clinical roles require distinct prediction targets, with shared barriers including inadequate monitoring practices, poor visibility of at-risk patients, and unclear trajectories for kidney injury progression. By integrating clinical context before algorithm development, we identified high-impact prediction targets that support actionable interventions for hospitalists, nephrologists, and intensivists, demonstrating how human-centered design can bridge technical model performance and real-world clinical utility.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.