ArticleBiological psychiatry global open science2026
Disorder-Specific Genetic Effects Drive the Associations Between Psychopathology and Cognitive Functioning.
Article in Biological psychiatry global open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Isolating transdiagnostic effects reveals specific genetic profiles in psychiatric disorders.JCPP advances · 2026Article
- From genes to networks: neurobiological bases of neurodiversity across common developmental disorders.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cognitive functioning is a critical dimension of psychopathology that remains underinvestigated. Because cognitive deficits often transcend diagnostic boundaries, it has been challenging to delineate specific relationships between psychiatric disorders and cognitive functioning. Genetic research offers novel, powerful tools to disentangle shared (transdiagnostic) from disorder-specific effects, thereby opening new avenues for understanding how psychopathology relates to cognition. Methods: We used genomic structural equation modeling to identify transdiagnostic and disorder-specific genetic risk. We derived polygenic scores in a longitudinal twin sample ( Results: The results showed that relationships between psychopathology and cognition are primarily driven by disorder-specific genetic risk rather than by transdiagnostic factors. Associations differed across disorders and cognitive domains. Within-family analyses indicated that associations between genetic risk for psychopathology and cognition operated through distinct pathways. While for some disorders (e.g., attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder), the effects could be attributed to confounding by environmental differences between nuclear families, for others (e.g., autism spectrum disorder), effects were robust to environmental confounding. Conclusions: In contrast to psychiatric symptoms, which are most effectively predicted by transdiagnostic genetic risk, our findings highlight the need to consider disorder-specific genetic effects when examining associations between psychopathology and cognition. Focusing solely on transdiagnostic risk is unlikely to capture the full complexity of these relationships or enhance our understanding of the distinct cognitive profiles associated with psychopathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.