ReviewResuscitation plus2026
Wolf Creek XVIII Part 3: Innovations in Defibrillation Science.
Review in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Wolf Creek XVIII Part 1: advancing resuscitation science.Resuscitation plus · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Effective defibrillation lies at the heart of successful resuscitation of ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. Can it be done better? Methods: The 50th Anniversary Wolf Creek XVIII Conference was hosted by the Max Harry Weil Institute for Critical Care Research and Innovation in Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA on June 19-21, 2025. Since its inception in 1975, the Wolf Creek Conference has a well-established tradition of providing a unique forum for robust intellectual exchange between thought leaders and scientists from academia and industry focused on advancing the science and practice of cardiac arrest resuscitation. Results: Innovations in Defibrillation Science was one of six focused panel topics that was presented and discussed by invited panelist and conference participants as recognized thought leaders in the field of cardiac arrest resuscitation, all of whom completed conflict of interest disclosures.The presentations by invited panelist and discussion focused on four distinct defibrillation-related topics, each written as was presented by its contributing author, providing their individual perspectives. Where applicable, each discussion addressed the current state, potential future state, knowledge gaps, barriers to translation, and research priorities in defibrillation science. Topics included refining the definition of defibrillation and resuscitation success, describing defibrillation mechanisms, double sequential external defibrillation for refractory ventricular fibrillation, and use of quantitative waveform analysis to better direct resuscitation care. Conclusions: Although much is known, much remains to be learned about defibrillation and its optimal application during resuscitation of cardiac arrest.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.