Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41648070›Full record

ReviewResuscitation plus2026

Wolf Creek XVIII Part 3: Innovations in Defibrillation Science.

Rudolph W Koster, Peter J Kudenchuk, Sheldon Cheskes, Giuseppe Ristagno, Gregory P Walcott

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rudolph W KosterAmsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Heart Center, Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Peter J KudenchukDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Washington; and King County Emergency Medical Services, Seattle, WA, USA.
Sheldon CheskesSunnybrook Centre for Prehospital Medicine, Sunnybrook Research Institute and Department of Emergency Services, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Giuseppe RistagnoDepartment of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Italy, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Gregory P WalcottDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Effective defibrillation lies at the heart of successful resuscitation of ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. Can it be done better? Methods: The 50th Anniversary Wolf Creek XVIII Conference was hosted by the Max Harry Weil Institute for Critical Care Research and Innovation in Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA on June 19-21, 2025. Since its inception in 1975, the Wolf Creek Conference has a well-established tradition of providing a unique forum for robust intellectual exchange between thought leaders and scientists from academia and industry focused on advancing the science and practice of cardiac arrest resuscitation. Results: Innovations in Defibrillation Science was one of six focused panel topics that was presented and discussed by invited panelist and conference participants as recognized thought leaders in the field of cardiac arrest resuscitation, all of whom completed conflict of interest disclosures.The presentations by invited panelist and discussion focused on four distinct defibrillation-related topics, each written as was presented by its contributing author, providing their individual perspectives. Where applicable, each discussion addressed the current state, potential future state, knowledge gaps, barriers to translation, and research priorities in defibrillation science. Topics included refining the definition of defibrillation and resuscitation success, describing defibrillation mechanisms, double sequential external defibrillation for refractory ventricular fibrillation, and use of quantitative waveform analysis to better direct resuscitation care. Conclusions: Although much is known, much remains to be learned about defibrillation and its optimal application during resuscitation of cardiac arrest.

Identifiers

PMID41648070
PMCPMC12870786

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.