Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41648659›Full record

ArticleESMO real world data and digital oncology2024

UK multicentre real-world data of the use of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in metastatic breast cancer.

G Gullick, C N Owen, W J Watkins, S Cook, J Helbrow, H Reed, R Squires, S Park, E Weir, F Aquilina and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO real world data and digital oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

G GullickBristol Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol.
C N OwenDepartment of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, University of Cardiff, Cardiff.
W J WatkinsDepartment of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, University of Cardiff, Cardiff.
S CookSomerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton.
J HelbrowGloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester.
H ReedBristol Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol.
R SquiresBristol Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol.
S ParkRoyal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter.
E WeirRoyal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter.
F AquilinaRoyal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter.
N WebberGloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester.
E NyeRoyal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath.
C AtkinsonSomerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton.
C BlairBristol Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol.
A HalsteadBristol Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol.
E DanielsGloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester.
A AlvesGloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester.
S ChewRoyal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter.
W ThomasGloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester.
S SpensleySomerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton.
M BeresfordRoyal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath.
R BowenRoyal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath.
T RobinsonPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) are widely used to treat hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/ human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This study aimed to capture the real-world efficacy and tolerability of CDK 4/6is. Patients and methods: Data were retrospectively collected from five centres in South West England between April 2017 and November 2022. Results: Six hundred and sixty-six patients were included (median age 66 years; interquartile range 23-92 years). Five hundred and forty-four (82.7%) were treated with CDK4/6i as first-line therapy and 122 (18.3%) as second-line therapy. Median follow-up time was 28 months (range 0-76 months). Five hundred and thirty-seven received palbociclib (80.6%), 85 patients received abemaciclib (12.8%) and 44 received ribociclib (6.6%). Palbociclib and ribociclib most frequently caused neutropenia (38.2% and 26.4%, respectively) whilst abemaciclib caused diarrhoea (61.2%). Rates of dose reduction (DR) (between 53.8% and 59.2%) and time to first DR were similar for all agents (2-3 cycles). For first-line therapy, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 31 months (25-35 months) for palbociclib, 16 months [9 months-not reached (NR)] for abemaciclib and 44 months (21-NR) for ribociclib. Median overall survival (OS) was 47 months (41 months-NR) for palbociclib and was not reached for abemaciclib or ribociclib. Low patient numbers precluded analysis of second-line therapy. On multivariate analysis, visceral metastases and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status were associated with shorter PFS and OS, whilst DR was associated with longer PFS and OS. Conclusion: These data demonstrate that CDK4/6is are an effective and safe treatment for metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer. Efficacy was in line with trial data and other real-world data. DR was associated with improved PFS and OS, suggesting that trials of CDK4/6is at a lower starting dose are warranted.

Indexed as

cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i)efficacyHR+/HER2− locally advanced and metastatic breast cancerreal-world evidencesurvival datatoxicity

Identifiers

PMID41648659
PMCPMC12836663

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.