Observational studyFrontiers in public health2025
Health literacy and self-care in patients with heart failure: a cross-sectional study.
Observational study in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current status and global trends in self-care among patients with heart failure: challenges and opportunities.The journal of cardiovascular aging · 2026Article
- From Correlation to Action: Advancing Health Literacy and Self-Care Research in Chronic Disease.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Article
- The effect of health literacy on quality of life in patients with heart failure: the mediating role of self-care confidence.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Health literacy (HL) is recognized as a key determinant in the management of chronic diseases, including heart failure (HF). Adequate HL facilitates understanding and application of health information, promoting effective self-care and improved clinical outcomes. In contrast, low HL is associated with poorer disease control, higher hospitalization rates, and increased mortality. Despite its importance, the relationship between HL and self-care in HF patients remains underexplored in specific sociodemographic and clinical contexts. Objective: This study aimed to assess HL and self-care capacity in individuals with HF, identify associated sociodemographic and clinical variables, and explore the predictive value of HL on self-care behaviors. Methods: A cross-sectional, observational study was conducted among 195 HF patients attending a referral center in Burgos, Spain. HL was assessed using the European health literacy survey questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q16), while self-care was evaluated using the European heart failure self-care behavior scale (EHFScBS). Data were collected via telephone interviews. Descriptive and inferential statistics were applied, including correlation and multiple linear regression analyzes. Results: The mean age of participants was 69.26 (±9 years), with a predominance of males (83.1%). Most participants reported medium social class (87.7%) and basic education (64.6%). HL levels were significantly associated with educational attainment, social class, and gender; women and individuals with higher education levels demonstrated greater HL scores. Regression analysis revealed that HL negatively predicted self-care scores ( Conclusion: Health literacy is a significant predictor of self-care in HF patients, and its levels are influenced by key sociodemographic variables. These findings underscore the necessity of incorporating HL assessment into clinical practice and tailoring educational interventions to address disparities. Enhancing HL could promote more effective self-management and potentially reduce adverse outcomes in HF populations. Future research should focus on longitudinal analyzes and the development of targeted, equitable interventions based on HL profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.