Evidence mapPaperPMID 41649249Full record

ArticleACS nano2026

Caveolar Endocytosis Governs Nanoneedle Transfection.

Ningjia Sun, Cong Wang, Yikai Wang, William Edwards, Marija Dimitrievska, Yike Li, Nemanja Vasovic, Samuel McLennan, Hongting Zhu, Ermei Mäkilä and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS nano, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Poking Pluripotency: Nanoinjection Into Human iPSCs.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Ningjia SunCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, U.K.
Cong WangCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-0263-1933
Yikai WangCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, U.K.
William EdwardsCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, U.K.
Marija DimitrievskaCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, U.K.
Yike LiCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, U.K.
Nemanja VasovicCentre for Gene Therapy & Regenerative Medicine, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, U.K.
Samuel McLennanCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, U.K.
Hongting ZhuCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, U.K.
Ermei MäkiläDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Turku, Turku 20014, Finland.
Jarno SalonenDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Turku, Turku 20014, Finland.
Jiefei ShenState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Centre for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Centre for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Qi PengPeter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London SE1 7EH, U.K.
Cristiano ScottàPeter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London SE1 7EH, U.K.
Giovanna LombardiPeter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London SE1 7EH, U.K.
Ciro ChiappiniCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-9893-4359

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanoneedles are emerging as a safe and scalable strategy for the genetic modification of primary human cells. However, a limited understanding of how interactions at the biointerface lead to functional gene expression continues to hinder clinical translation. While direct membrane penetration, permeabilization, and endocytosis have been proposed as intracellular delivery avenues, the mechanistic connection between delivery and successful transfection remains unclear. Here, we identify caveolae-mediated endocytosis, dependent on Caveolin-1, as a key mechanism enabling nanoneedle transfection. By selectively modulating Caveolin-1 expression in primary human regulatory T cells and MG63 cells and investigating endolysosomal processing, we show that although nucleic acids can be efficiently delivered in the absence of Caveolin-1, gene expression occurs only when caveolar endocytosis is present. These findings reveal a mechanistic basis and establish a broader design principle for nanoneedle transfection: interfacing must be accompanied by the engagement of permissive cellular trafficking pathways to achieve gene expression.

Indexed as

CaveolaeEndocytosisTransfectionCaveolin 1HumansCaveolin 1Caveolinendocytosisnanoneedlenonviral transfectionregulatory T cells

Identifiers

PMID41649249
PMCPMC12918721

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.