Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41650131›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Identification of antimicrobial compounds in Dipsacus inermis via phytochemical profiling, in vitro assessment, and advanced computational techniques.

Drakhshaan, Tahir Ali Chohan, Aisha Qayyum, Abdullah R Alzahrani, Ahd A Mansour, Hayat Ali Alzahrani, Abida Khan, Muhammad Umer Khan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

DrakhshaanInstitute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Tahir Ali ChohanInstitute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1599-8949
Aisha QayyumDepartment of pediatric medicine, Fatima memorial Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.
Abdullah R AlzahraniDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Al-Abidiyah, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7782-0574
Ahd A MansourMedical Laboratory Sciences Department, Fakeeh College for Medical Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Hayat Ali AlzahraniDepartment of Medical Laboratory Technology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Northern Border University, Arar, Saudi Arabia.
Abida KhanCenter for Health Research, Northern Border University, Arar, Saudi Arabia.
Muhammad Umer KhanInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a major challenge in treating infections such as pneumonia and typhoid fever, necessitating novel therapeutics. Plant-derived natural products provide a promising alternative. This study evaluated dichloromethane (DCM) and methanol (MeOH) extracts of Dipsacus inermis against six bacterial strains: Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella typhi, and Enterobacter aerogenes. Antibacterial activity was assessed following standardized CLSI guidelines for both zone of inhibition (ZOI) and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) assays. The DCM extract demonstrated superior activity, with ZOI values of 17.87 ± 0.23 mm (S. aureus and E. aerogenes) and 16.83 ± 0.29 mm (S. typhi), and MICs of 1.562 mg/mL (B. subtilis and E. aerogenes) and 12.5 mg/mL (S. aureus, S. typhi, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa). One-way ANOVA followed by pairwise post-hoc comparisons confirmed significant differences among extract concentrations and relative to the reference control, highlighting dose-dependent potency. GC-MS and HPLC analyses identified multiple bioactive compounds, primarily terpenoids and steroids. All identified compounds were subjected to in silico studies against DNA gyrase B, tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase, PBP2X, PBP4, and DHFR. Compounds DI10 and DI31 emerged as potent multi-target leads, while DI22 exhibited selective activity against PBP4. ADMET profiling indicated favorable pharmacokinetics, high intestinal absorption, and minimal toxicity risks. DFT and MESP analyses revealed electronic features and reactive sites critical for ligand-protein interactions. Molecular dynamics simulations confirmed stable protein-ligand complexes, with RMSD stabilizing at 1.5-2.5 Å, compact conformations (Rg: 16.3-21.6 Å), persistent hydrogen bonds, and favorable binding free energies (-45 to -52 kcal/mol) via MM-PBSA. These integrated in vitro and in silico findings indicate that DCM-derived compounds, particularly DI10 and DI31, are primarily responsible for the observed antibacterial activity and represent promising candidates for antimicrobial drug development.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsPhytochemicalsPlant ExtractsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationAnti-Bacterial AgentsPhytochemicalsPlant Extracts

Identifiers

PMID41650131
PMCPMC12880709

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.