ArticlePloS one2026
Stochastic virtual population in type 1 diabetes.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate, reliable, and efficient estimation of blood glucose dynamics from real-world data is challenging due to the time-varying nature, high uncertainty, and nonlinear interplay of complex processes. In this study, we propose and investigate a stochastic representation of a virtual population by fitting a hierarchical Bayesian model. In total, we use 500 24h-long sequences, 50 from each of the 10 patients with type 1 diabetes on multiple daily injection therapy. We model uncertainty on multiple levels, in physiology and in self-reported events, and take into account intra- and interday variability, and the effect of physical activity as well. The root-mean-square error between the glucose measurements and the mean of the posterior predictive distribution using the fitted low-rank multivariate normal guide is 12.44 mg/dL. We show that the posterior distributions can be used to simulate realistic intra-, and interday variability in terms of the investigated patient cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.