ArticleCancer immunology research2026
Neoadjuvant Endocrine Treatment plus Mammaglobin-A DNA Vaccine Induces Antitumor Immune Responses in the Primary Tumor and Peripheral Blood of Patients with Breast Cancer: Insights from a Phase Ib Clinical Trial.
Article in Cancer immunology research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tumor-associated antigen (TAA) vaccines are being explored as a strategy to induce antitumor immune responses. Mammaglobin-A (Mam-A) is a TAA expressed in >50% of patients with breast cancer. Previously, we have shown that Mam-A DNA vaccines induce antitumor immune responses in patients with stable metastatic disease. To further evaluate the potential of the Mam-A vaccine, we initiated a phase Ib clinical trial in patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer prior to surgery. Eight patients were assigned to arm 1 (neoadjuvant endocrine therapy alone) and 17 to arm 2 (neoadjuvant endocrine therapy plus Mam-A vaccination); the final analysis included 8 patients from arm 1 and 13 from arm 2. Ex vivo enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells demonstrated that Mam-A vaccination induced Mam-A-specific T cells in 8 of 13 patients. Intracellular cytokine staining and Mam-A-specific tetramer staining revealed that vaccine-induced Mam-A-specific T cells included both CD4+ and CD8+ polyfunctional T cells. Finally, high-throughput imaging mass cytometry identified 24 cellular metaclusters with features of tumor, immune, stromal, and endothelial cells and revealed an increased CD8+ T-cell prevalence in the tumor after Mam-A vaccination. In particular, vaccination was associated with the infiltration of PD-1+CD8+ T cells. In addition, postvaccination tumor samples exhibited close spatial interactions between cytotoxic CD8+ T cells (CTL) and Mam-A+ tumor cells and between CTL and antigen-experienced CD4+ T cells. Together, these results suggest that Mam-A DNA vaccination elicits both systemic and intratumoral antitumor immune responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.