Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41651868›Full record

ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2026

Navigating the landscape of direct cellular reprogramming with DiReG.

Michael Lauber, Markus List

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael LauberData Science in Systems Biology, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
Markus ListData Science in Systems Biology, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany. markus.list@tum.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct cellular reprogramming, converting one differentiated cell type directly into another, holds immense promise for regenerative medicine, developmental biology, and disease modeling. Identifying optimal transcription factor (TF) combinations to control this process remains complex and labor-intensive. Over the last decade, various computational tools emerged to infer TF sets for reprogramming. However, current methodologies possess critical limitations, and the absence of robust benchmarking standards makes it impossible to precisely validate and compare their performance. To address these challenges, we present a comprehensive analysis of existing computational methods for direct reprogramming and introduce a web application designed to support researchers in identifying and validating optimal TF sets. Our platform integrates predictions from established tools, incorporates a state-of-the-art Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system for efficient literature querying, and offers tools to further validate predictions. By providing a unified and interactive resource, our web application enhances the accessibility and efficiency of TF discovery for direct reprogramming. Furthermore, we discuss critical limitations shared by current methodologies and highlight the need for computational tools that can account for the complex regulatory dynamics of direct reprogramming. This work not only advances the toolkit available to researchers but also lays the groundwork for future innovations aimed at realizing the full potential of direct reprogramming.

Indexed as

Cellular ReprogrammingComputational BiologyAnimalsHumansRegenerative MedicineSoftwareTranscription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID41651868
PMCPMC12988218

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.