ArticleScientific reports2026
Real-world performance of an AI system for diabetic retinopathy screening.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in diabetic retinopathy: from automated screening to risk-stratified care.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Screening for Patients With Diabetic Retinopathy and Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Family Medicine and Geriatric and Gerontology Care: Protocol for a Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Agreement Between a General-Purpose AI Model and Retinal Specialists in Color Fundus Photography-A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of preventable blindness, and the growing global burden of diabetes is placing increasing pressure on ophthalmic services. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based retinal image analysis offers a promising strategy to scale up DR screening while reducing reliance on specialist graders. We assessed the performance of an AI-based DR screening system implemented in a real-world endocrinology clinic at the Erasmus Hospital, Belgium. Adult patients with diabetes underwent non-mydriatic fundus photography, and images were analyzed by the AI system for referable DR and diabetic macular edema. All images were independently graded by a retinal specialist using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) classification as the reference standard. Of 405 patients screened, 353 (86.7%) were included in the primary analysis. The AI system achieved an area under the curve of 96.5%, sensitivity of 88.9%, specificity of 98.7%, and high predictive values for referable DR detection. Subgroup analyses showed consistently high accuracy across demographic and clinical strata. Multivariate analysis identified higher HbA1c at diagnosis and longer diabetes duration as significant predictors of referable DR for both AI and human grading. These findings support the robustness, generalizability and operational feasibility of this AI system for DR screening in routine clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.