ArticleEuropean radiology2026
MRI features in atypical idiopathic intracranial hypertension.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reconsidering the non-obese phenotype of idiopathic intracranial hypertension.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Neuroimaging outcomes in suspected papilledema.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIdiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) primarily affects obese women of reproductive age. However, IIH can also occur in individuals outside this typical demographic, where it is associated with a more severe clinical course and poorer visual outcome. Characteristic features of IIH have been identified on cerebral MRI but have not been systematically studied in atypical patient subgroups. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective cohort study investigated the prevalence of MRI features of IIH across the following subgroups: males, individuals with normal BMI (< 26 kg/m
resultsThe study included 172 patients. ES was most frequent with 87%, followed by ONSD in 60%, TSS in 46%, ONT in 39% and PGF in 37%. ONH-DWI hyperintensity was present in 35%, and ONH-contrast enhancement in 22%. The prevalence of MRI features did not significantly differ across demographic subgroups and between atypical and typical IIH. Regression models did not indicate associations between MRI features and visual outcomes.
conclusionsMRI features of IIH were equally prevalent in typical and atypical demographics. These findings suggest a consistent radiological presentation of IIH across demographic profiles, indicating a shared imaging phenotype regardless of atypical clinical characteristics. Limitations related to the retrospective design warrant future prospective studies. KEY POINTS: Question Do MRI features of IIH differ across demographic subgroups (males, non-obese and older patients) and are they associated with visual outcomes? Findings MRI features of IIH were equally prevalent in typical and atypical patients; however, no significant association between imaging findings and visual outcome was observed. Clinical relevance While MRI supports the diagnosis of IIH across demographic subgroups, established imaging features do not seem to aid in identifying patients at risk of visual deterioration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.