Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41652239›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Cervical myelopathy screening using in-shoe inertial measurement unit sensors and machine learning focusing on gait disturbance.

Kazuya Tsukamoto, Koji Fujita, Fumiyuki Nihey, Tomoyuki Kuroiwa, Takuya Ibara, Akiko Yamamoto, Eriku Yamada, Tomohiko Waki, Toru Sasaki, Takashi Hirai and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Kazuya TsukamotoInstitute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Koji FujitaInstitute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. fujiorth@tmd.ac.jp.
Fumiyuki NiheyNEC (Japan), Tokyo, Japan.
Tomoyuki KuroiwaInstitute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Takuya IbaraInstitute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Akiko YamamotoInstitute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Eriku YamadaInstitute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomohiko WakiInstitute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Toru SasakiInstitute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi HiraiInstitute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Akimoto NimuraInstitute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroshi KajitaniNEC (Japan), Tokyo, Japan.
Chenhui HuangNEC (Japan), Tokyo, Japan.
Kentaro NakaharaNEC (Japan), Tokyo, Japan.
Toshitaka YoshiiInstitute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCervical myelopathy (CM) often presents with gait disturbances, which can lead to falls and spinal cord injury. As the presence of gait disturbances negatively affects postoperative improvement in patients with CM, early detection of gait disturbances is crucial. However, current gait analysis methods require specialisation, limiting their feasibility for screening. This study aimed to perform gait analysis in patients with CM using wearable in-shoe inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors and to develop a screening system using machine learning.

methodsThis study included 26 patients with CM and 26 age-matched healthy controls. Gait parameters were measured using IMU sensors while participants walked along a 16 m corridor. Eleven gait parameters and their coefficients of variation (CV) were analysed. A machine learning model using the extreme gradient boosting algorithm was developed for CM classification.

resultsPatients with CM exhibited significantly lower gait speed, stride length, dorsiflexion angle, plantarflexion angle, and foot height, along with increased stance time and stance phase. CVs of gait parameters were higher in patients with CM, with an increased stance phase observed from the early stages. The classification model achieved high performance (AUC = 0.89, sensitivity = 81%, specificity = 85%), with stance phase and CVs of stride length and plantarflexion angle identified as key predictive features.

conclusionWearable IMU sensors effectively captured gait disturbances in CM patients, and machine learning enabled accurate classification. This method enables daily gait monitoring and could facilitate early detection and intervention for CM.

Indexed as

Gait AnalysisGait Disorders, NeurologicMachine LearningSpinal Cord DiseasesWearable Electronic DevicesAdultAgedCervical VertebraeFemaleGaitHumansMaleMiddle AgedCervical myelopathyGait analysisIn-shoe inertial measurement unitMachine learningScreening

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.