Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41652254›Full record

ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2026

Metabolic insights and novel risk score for adherent perinephric fat in partial nephrectomy: results from a prospective study.

Łukasz Mielczarek, Omar Tayara, Wojciech Malewski, Przemysław Szostek, Paweł Rajwa, Riccardo Bertolo, Fabio Zattoni, Carlo Prevato, Sławomir Poletajew, Łukasz Nyk and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Łukasz MielczarekDepartment of Urooncology and Minimally Invasive Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland. lukasz.mielczarek@ecz-otwock.pl.
Omar TayaraDepartment of Urooncology and Minimally Invasive Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Wojciech MalewskiDepartment of Urooncology and Minimally Invasive Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Przemysław SzostekDepartment of Urooncology and Minimally Invasive Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Paweł RajwaDepartment of Urooncology and Minimally Invasive Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Riccardo BertoloUrology Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Fabio ZattoniDepartment of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, Urology Clinic, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Carlo PrevatoDepartment of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, Urology Clinic, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Sławomir PoletajewDepartment of Urooncology and Minimally Invasive Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Łukasz NykDepartment of Urooncology and Minimally Invasive Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr KrystDepartment of Urooncology and Minimally Invasive Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to identify preoperative metabolic and radiological predictors of adherent perinephric fat (APF) and to develop a predictive scoring system for its assessment.

methodsWe conducted a prospective study of consecutive patients with renal tumors undergoing open or minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (PN). APF was intraoperatively defined as the need for subcapsular renal dissection to isolate the tumor. Patient characteristics were compared according to APF presence. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed, and the resulting model was used to develop a predictive scoring system.

resultsA total of 200 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 34 (17%) had APF. On multivariable analysis, presence of perinephric fat stranding (p = 0.003), posterior perinephric fat thickness ≥ 25 mm (p < 0.001), serum urea ≥ 33 mg/dl (p = 0.004), albumin ≤ 4.3 g/dl (p = 0.007), and HDL cholesterol ≤ 53 mg/dl (p = 0.019) were predictors of APF. A model incorporating these five variables achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.92. These parameters were subsequently integrated into the novel SHARP-U (Stranding, HDL cholesterol, Albumin, Renal Perinephric fat thickness, Urea) score, ranging from 0 to 7, to predict the presence of APF.

conclusionThe SHARP-U score provides a simple and reliable tool for preoperative prediction of APF in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy. Early identification of individuals at risk may aid surgical planning and patient counseling. External prospective validation of the SHARP-U score is warranted to confirm its clinical applicability.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueCarcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsNephrectomyAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentAdherent perinephric fatNephrometry scorePartial nephrectomyRenal cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID41652254
PMCPMC13375828

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.