ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2026
Metabolic insights and novel risk score for adherent perinephric fat in partial nephrectomy: results from a prospective study.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to identify preoperative metabolic and radiological predictors of adherent perinephric fat (APF) and to develop a predictive scoring system for its assessment.
methodsWe conducted a prospective study of consecutive patients with renal tumors undergoing open or minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (PN). APF was intraoperatively defined as the need for subcapsular renal dissection to isolate the tumor. Patient characteristics were compared according to APF presence. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed, and the resulting model was used to develop a predictive scoring system.
resultsA total of 200 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 34 (17%) had APF. On multivariable analysis, presence of perinephric fat stranding (p = 0.003), posterior perinephric fat thickness ≥ 25 mm (p < 0.001), serum urea ≥ 33 mg/dl (p = 0.004), albumin ≤ 4.3 g/dl (p = 0.007), and HDL cholesterol ≤ 53 mg/dl (p = 0.019) were predictors of APF. A model incorporating these five variables achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.92. These parameters were subsequently integrated into the novel SHARP-U (Stranding, HDL cholesterol, Albumin, Renal Perinephric fat thickness, Urea) score, ranging from 0 to 7, to predict the presence of APF.
conclusionThe SHARP-U score provides a simple and reliable tool for preoperative prediction of APF in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy. Early identification of individuals at risk may aid surgical planning and patient counseling. External prospective validation of the SHARP-U score is warranted to confirm its clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.