ArticleBMC neurology2026
Disease trajectories and end of life care in a Norwegian ALS cohort.
Article in BMC neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Palliative Care Involvement in Hospitalized Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis retrospective cohort study aims to provide comprehensive data on the disease trajectory and end-of-life care in patients dying from ALS.
methodsThe study presents detailed information on a cohort dying from ALS in the area served by Akershus University Hospital from 2011 to 2022. Data was obtained from the patient medical records.
results118 patients were included. 65 patients (55%) were referred to the Department of Palliative medicine for specialist palliative care, with a median duration from referral to death of two months and one third of patients not being able to communicate verbally at the time of referral. The most common life-sustaining treatment was non-invasive ventilation and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, whereas most prevalent limitation of life-sustaining treatment was withholding of tracheostomy with invasive ventilation. Hospital was the most common place of death with 54 (46%) of all deaths. For in-hospital-deaths, the most common place of death was the palliative care ward, with 21 patients (39%), but a substantial proportion (17%) died at intensive or intermediate care units. Overall, 37% of in-hospital deaths had been admitted to either intensive or intermediate care units during their last week of life, which may suggest these patients deteriorated rapidly without having documented advanced care planning and therefore received resource demanding and futile treatment during the last week of life.
conclusionMany patients lived in their own homes until admitted to their last hospital stay in life. However, these last hospital stays were frequently characterized by insufficient advanced care planning, leading to futile overtreatment.
trial registrationRetrospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.