ArticleBMC health services research2026
Obesity treatment across healthcare levels: collaboration and digital solutions - a qualitative study of health professional and patient perspectives.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObesity is a chronic condition, and long-term weight loss through lifestyle treatment remains challenging. Although early lifestyle interventions and coordinated care across healthcare levels are widely recognized as important, referral pathways and follow-up support often remain unclear for both patients and health professionals. Digital solutions may improve communication, knowledge sharing, and continuity of care; however, most tools target individual lifestyle change and do not support collaboration across healthcare levels. This study aimed to explore health professional and patient perspectives on how collaboration and digital solutions can improve obesity care across healthcare levels.
methodsA qualitative design using triangulation of data sources with focus group interviews with health professionals (n = 12 across two focus groups) and individual interviews with patients (n = 12) was employed. Various health professionals from primary and specialist care, working with patients with obesity, were recruited via snowball sampling, whereby some professionals recommended colleagues with relevant experience. Patients were purposeful recruited for their experience with obesity treatment both in primary and specialist care. Both focus group and individual interviews followed semi-structured interview guides addressing experiences with obesity treatment, patient–professional relationships, collaboration across healthcare levels, and the use of digital solutions. All interviews were audio-recorded and analysed using thematic analysis.
resultsAnalysis of the interviews revealed four key themes: (1) Communication, trust, and experiences of stigma in patient–professional interactions; (2) Knowledge gaps and coordination across primary and specialist healthcare; (3) Interdisciplinary collaboration in obesity care pathways; (4) Experiences with digital solutions and in-person care in obesity treatment.
conclusionsSuccessful implementation of digital solutions requires alignment with patient needs while preserving the therapeutic relationship through in-person care. Patients were generally receptive to increased collaboration and shared responsibilities, whereas health professionals expressed more caution. Strengthening collaboration across healthcare levels, combined with thoughtful use of digital solutions, may improve patient-centered obesity treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.