Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41652399›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

Dental students' knowledge, perceptions, and educational needs regarding artificial intelligence: a multinational cross-sectional survey.

Argyro Kavadella, Sergio E Uribe, Marco Antonio Dias da Silva, Falk Schwendicke, Antonín Tichý, Reinhilde Jacobs, Daniel Karni, Akhilanand Chaurasia, Kostis Giannakopoulos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Argyro KavadellaSchool of Dentistry, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus. a.kavadella@euc.ac.cy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-0560-8373
Sergio E UribeDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Oral Health, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia.
Marco Antonio Dias da SilvaUniversity of Oulu, Oulo, Finland.
Falk SchwendickeDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Periodontology and Digital Dentistry, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Antonín TichýDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Periodontology and Digital Dentistry, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Reinhilde JacobsOmfsimpath Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Daniel KarniSchool of Dentistry, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Akhilanand ChaurasiaDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India.
Kostis GiannakopoulosSchool of Dentistry, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo explore undergraduate dental students' AI knowledge, perceptions, and concerns, and to identify their educational needs based on these findings.

methodsA cross-sectional, anonymous survey was conducted using a 30-item online questionnaire distributed to dental schools across multiple countries. The survey employed an exploratory, observational approach with convenience and snowball sampling methods. The population included dental students from all academic semesters, and participation in the survey was voluntary. The questionnaire consisted of multiple-choice and Likert-scale questions organized into five sections: consent form, demographic data, knowledge/awareness, perceptions/attitudes, and ethics-related questions. Data were analysed using Jamovi and R. Descriptive statistics summarised the demographic characteristics and responses to survey questions. Non-parametric correlation analysis was employed as a primary measure of association for relationships between ordinal variables. For regression analyses, ordinal logistic regression models were constructed to identify predictors for specific outcomes. For each Likert scale question, an ordinal logistic regression model was constructed (dependent variable), with the knowledge questions score as a covariate and the nominal answered questions as factors.

results508 students completed the questionnaire. Most students (76.2%) agreed they understood what AI entails, and 67.4% were familiar with generic AI tools; however, only 34.7% knew AI's dental applications. 70.3% supported AI education during undergraduate studies, favoring case-based teaching, and 53.7% felt their current education had not adequately prepared them for AI technologies. Students declared that AI would be beneficial in diagnostic analysis (64.5%), enhance clinical practice (69.5%), and improve patient care (60.4%). Also, 41.7% believed that AI would cause a reduction in professionals' skills and dehumanize healthcare (29.2%). 3/4 students agreed that AI ethics should be taught from a multidisciplinary perspective, and 65.3% declared AI in healthcare should be legally regulated.

conclusionsThis study establishes baseline data on dental students' AI knowledge and educational requirements across multiple countries. Despite general AI familiarity, understanding of dental applications remains limited. The results highlight the need for structured AI education programs tailored to students' knowledge gaps and learning preferences. Dental students' understanding and perceptions of AI can effectively guide the identification of their learning needs and inform curriculum integration.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEducation, DentalStudents, DentalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAI curriculumArtificial intelligenceChatGPTDental educationDentistryEducatorsHealth educationHigher educationStudents questionnaireUndergraduate

Identifiers

PMID41652399
PMCPMC12977397

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.