ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
The effects of sacubitril/valsartan compared to valsartan in experimentally induced chronic kidney disease.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sacubitril/valsartan is a combined neprilysin inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker which simultaneously potentiates the beneficial effects of natriuretic peptides while blocking angiotensin II accumulation. Numerous studies suggest that sacubitril/valsartan has better renal protective effects compared to valsartan but the evidence remains inconsistent. This study compared renal and blood pressure (BP)-lowering effects of sacubitril/valsartan versus valsartan in rats with adenine-induced chronic kidney disease (CKD). This model replicates slow progression and structural and functional characteristics of human CKD. Male Wistar rats (n = 24) were divided into four groups and treated for 35 days as follows: group 1 served as control; group 2 received 0.25% adenine; group 3 received adenine plus sacubitril/valsartan; group 4 received adenine plus valsartan. Adenine significantly increased systolic BP. It also significantly increased the urinary albumin/creatinine ratio, N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAG), plasma urea, creatinine, uric acid, and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) while reducing creatinine clearance. Additionally, adenine significantly increased inflammatory markers, decreased antioxidant activity, and induced tubular necrosis, dilatation, and interstitial inflammation. Sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduced systolic BP, with greater effects than valsartan. Both treatments reversed adenine-induced alterations in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio, NAG, plasma urea, creatinine, NGAL, and creatinine clearance, with more pronounced improvements in urea, NAG, and creatinine clearance observed with valsartan. Furthermore, both treatments ameliorated inflammatory and antioxidant changes to a comparable extent. Both treatments showed histopathological improvements, but these were more marked with valsartan. To conclude, both sacubitril/valsartan and valsartan effectively mitigated adenine-induced CKD changes, with sacubitril/valsartan producing greater systolic BP reduction and valsartan showing more pronounced renoprotective effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.