ArticleScientific reports2026
Movement speed of an autonomous prosthetic limb shapes embodiment, usability and robotic social attributes in virtual reality.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Autonomous robotic prostheses can aid individuals with limb loss regain functionality and near-normal appearance. However, to psychologically integrate such limbs into one's body image, it is necessary to understand how movement characteristics, such as movement speed, affect the sense of embodiment. Using a VR simulation, we investigated how the speed of autonomous lower-arm movements affects embodiment and user-perception. Nineteen healthy participants embodied an amputated virtual avatar with a prosthetic lower left-arm moving autonomously at six different speeds following minimum-jerk trajectories. Participants rated sense of body ownership, sense of agency, usability, competence, warmth, and discomfort after performing a reaching task at each speed. Ownership, sense of agency, and usability were highest for moderate speeds (autonomous movements lasting 1 s), and were significantly lower for both faster (125 ms) and slower (4 s) movements (p < 0.05). Competence was significantly higher at moderate and moderately fast speeds compared to slower speeds. Discomfort was significantly higher at the fastest speed compared to moderate and slower speeds. Overall, the results show a tendency of moderate movement speeds being favorable for user perception of autonomous limbs and hint at the existence of an optimal speed or a speed range for enhancing embodiment and usability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.