ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
The effect of the preferred anesthesia method on early postoperative outcomes in elderly patients with hip fractures; a retrospective three-way comparative study.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly are associated with high morbidity and delayed recovery. The type of anesthesia used during surgical fixation may significantly impact postoperative outcomes. The erector spinae plane (ESP) block has recently emerged as a promising alternative to traditional techniques.
methodsThis retrospective study evaluated 64 patients who underwent proximal femoral nailing (PFN) and received either general anesthesia (GA), spinal anesthesia (SA), or ESP block. Pain (VAS), function (Harris and Oxford Hip Scores), quality of life (EQ-5D), complication rates, mobilization time, and hospital stay were compared.
resultsAll groups showed improvement, but the ESP block group had significantly lower pain scores (p < 0.001), better functional outcomes, earlier mobilization, and shorter hospital stays. Complications such as urinary retention and delirium were more frequent in the GA group.
conclusionESP block provided superior pain control, enhanced functional recovery, and fewer complications in patients undergoing PFN. It represents a safe and effective alternative in the anesthetic management of elderly patients with fragility fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.