ArticleJournal of nanobiotechnology2026
Nanozymes subvert pharmacological conventions: insights from counteracting the placental side effects of TiO₂ nanozymes.
Article in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As a classic nanozyme, titanium dioxide (TiO₂) is increasingly utilized in medical fields such as anti-infection, tumor therapy, and inflammation regulation. However, their expanding application has raised concerns regarding biosafety, particularly their potential threat to maternal and fetal health. To evaluate this risk, this study established a pregnant rat model, focusing on the placenta as a potential target organ, to investigate the developmental toxicity and potential interventions associated with the use of TiO₂ nanozymes (TiO₂ NZs) as therapeutic agents during pregnancy. The results revealed that gestational intake of TiO₂ NZs led to fetal growth restriction, abnormal placental weight increase, and induced placental energy metabolism disruption along with excessive autophagy activation. Surprisingly, when attempting to reverse these toxic effects, we found that TiO₂ NZs suppressed AMPK expression, prompting Compound C and phenformin to unconventionally regulate energy imbalance-induced autophagy via non-AMPK/mTOR pathway-dependent mechanisms. This resulted in a complex scenario where the two drugs produced inverted effects-"aggravation" vs. "alleviation"-during intervention. These findings indicate that despite the significant medical value of TiO₂ as a nanozyme, they pose non-negligible safety risks, and pharmacological interventions may trigger unexpected effects. Therefore, while advancing their clinical application, it is crucial to prioritize in-depth mechanistic studies and the development of precise intervention strategies, especially ensuring the long-term health and safety for maternal and fetal populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.