ReviewThe Journal of biological chemistry2026
Molecular mechanisms of mitochondrial AAA+ proteases.
Review in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Introduction to the thematic review series on intracellular protein degradation. The ubiquitous biology of intracellular protein degradation: A tribute to Alfred L. ("Fred") Goldberg.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026Article
- Reprogramming Mitochondrial Adaptation: LONP1 at the Crossroads of Proteostasis, Metabolism, and Disease.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mitochondrial AAA+ proteases, LONP1, ClpXP, YME1L (i-AAA), and the m-AAA complex, maintain protein quality and shape organelle function. Growing interest in these enzymes stems from their association with neurodegeneration, cardiomyopathy, metabolic disease, and cancer. Recent structural and biophysical work clarifies how ATP-driven conformational cycles enable substrate recognition, unfolding, translocation, and proteolysis, and how assembly state, subunit composition, and regulatory inputs tune activity. These insights help interpret patient variants and guide experiments that connect mechanism to phenotype. Here we review shared mechanistic principles across the four proteases, contrast their architectures and regulatory features, and relate these properties to substrate selection and disease mechanisms, with emphasis on evidence from structural, biochemical, and cellular studies. We also survey strategies to modulate function. Small molecules, exemplified by Dordaviprone (ONC201), which activate human ClpP, provide proof of concept, and emerging modalities such as engineered macromolecules may offer the selectivity and localization required to correct disease mechanisms or exploit disease dependencies. By integrating mechanisms, disease links, and modulation strategies, this review provides a framework for translating basic insight on mitochondrial AAA+ proteases into new tools and, ultimately, therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.