ArticleBMC public health2026
Geospatial and machine learning analyses of cardiovascular disease mortality across the continental United States: Identifying associated variables using Shapley values.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Geographical disparities and spatial non-stationarity in stroke prevalence across China: a Bayesian analysis.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Epidemiological characteristics and spatiotemporal analysis of scarlet fever in Guangzhou, China: the surveillance of 20 years.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Examining the association between spatial accessibility to emergency cardiac care centers and cardiovascular mortality in Georgia, United States.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Spatial analysis of predictors of prostate cancer incidence in the united states using multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR).BMC public health · 2026Article
- Impact of greenhouse gases and air pollutants on the incidence and mortality of HBV and HCV in China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain the leading cause of mortality in the U.S. and exhibit pronounced geographic variation. Although prior studies have documented regional disparities, fewer have combined spatial pattern detection with systematic comparisons of machine learning and deep learning approaches to identify county-level variables associated with CVD mortality at a national scale.
methodsCounty-level CVD mortality data (2018–2021) were analyzed across the continental U.S. Spatial autocorrelation was examined using Global Moran’s I and Getis–Ord Gi* statistics to identify clustering patterns. Separately, predictive modeling was conducted using five machine learning algorithms: linear regression, decision tree, random forest, support vector machine, and extreme gradient boosting, and a deep learning artificial neural network (ANN), drawing on 40 demographic, clinical, socioeconomic, environmental, healthcare, and behavioral variables. Model interpretability was assessed using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP).
resultsSignificant spatial clustering of CVD mortality was observed, with persistent high-mortality hotspots concentrated in the southeastern U.S., consistent with the “Stroke Belt.” Among the evaluated models, the ANN achieved the highest predictive performance (R² = 0.89), followed by XGBoost (R² = 0.82). SHAP analyses consistently identified hypertension prevalence, population aged 65 years and older, poverty, long-term PM2.5 exposure, and rural–urban status as the most influential contributors to CVD mortality predictions.
conclusionsThese findings highlight the strong geographic clustering of CVD mortality in the U.S. and demonstrate the value of interpretable predictive modeling for clarifying how multiple, co-occurring population-level factors align with observed spatial disparities. Together, spatial analysis and explainable machine learning provide complementary insights into the distribution of CVD mortality, informing place-based public health assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.