Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41656207›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

Geospatial and machine learning analyses of cardiovascular disease mortality across the continental United States: Identifying associated variables using Shapley values.

Nima Kianfar, Mahdi Taghi, Shayan Dasdar, Abe Mollalo, Behzad Kiani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nima KianfarDepartment of Geospatial Information Systems, Faculty of Geomatics Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran. nimakianfar@email.kntu.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7566-3587
Mahdi TaghiDepartment of Computer Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Shayan DasdarTehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abe MollaloDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Behzad KianiFaculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research (UQCCR), The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain the leading cause of mortality in the U.S. and exhibit pronounced geographic variation. Although prior studies have documented regional disparities, fewer have combined spatial pattern detection with systematic comparisons of machine learning and deep learning approaches to identify county-level variables associated with CVD mortality at a national scale.

methodsCounty-level CVD mortality data (2018–2021) were analyzed across the continental U.S. Spatial autocorrelation was examined using Global Moran’s I and Getis–Ord Gi* statistics to identify clustering patterns. Separately, predictive modeling was conducted using five machine learning algorithms: linear regression, decision tree, random forest, support vector machine, and extreme gradient boosting, and a deep learning artificial neural network (ANN), drawing on 40 demographic, clinical, socioeconomic, environmental, healthcare, and behavioral variables. Model interpretability was assessed using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP).

resultsSignificant spatial clustering of CVD mortality was observed, with persistent high-mortality hotspots concentrated in the southeastern U.S., consistent with the “Stroke Belt.” Among the evaluated models, the ANN achieved the highest predictive performance (R² = 0.89), followed by XGBoost (R² = 0.82). SHAP analyses consistently identified hypertension prevalence, population aged 65 years and older, poverty, long-term PM2.5 exposure, and rural–urban status as the most influential contributors to CVD mortality predictions.

conclusionsThese findings highlight the strong geographic clustering of CVD mortality in the U.S. and demonstrate the value of interpretable predictive modeling for clarifying how multiple, co-occurring population-level factors align with observed spatial disparities. Together, spatial analysis and explainable machine learning provide complementary insights into the distribution of CVD mortality, informing place-based public health assessment.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesMachine LearningSpatial AnalysisBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsCluster AnalysisHumansPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestUnited StatesArtificial neural networksCardiovascular diseasesMachine learningShapleySpatial analysis

Identifiers

PMID41656207
PMCPMC12983589

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.