Trial reportImplementation science : IS2026
Testing normalization process theory in a randomized trial of mental health clinics implementing digital measurement-based care.
Trial report in Implementation science : IS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04096274 (Randomized Trial of a Leadership and Organizational Change Strategy to Improve the Implementation and Sustainment of Digital Measurement-based Care in Youth Mental Health Services), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Trial of a Leadership and Organizational Change Strategy to Improve the Implementation and Sustainment of Digital Measurement-based Care in Youth Mental Health Services
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNormalization process theory (NPT) is one of the most highly cited implementation theories that explains the mechanisms by which new complex health interventions become embedded and sustained in healthcare settings; however, few of its predictions have been subjected to inferential hypothesis testing. In this theory-driven, ancillary analysis of a large hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation trial, we tested two NPT predictions: (1) its generative mechanisms of coherence, cognitive participation, collective action, and reflexive monitoring are modifiable in response to deliberate change efforts, and (2) greater enactment of these mechanisms predicts greater future sustainment of complex health interventions.
methodsThe trial tested two strategies to improve the implementation and sustainment of digital measurement-based care in outpatient mental health clinics serving youth. Twenty-one clinics were randomized to either training and technical assistance alone (k = 10) or training and technical assistance plus the Leadership and Organizational Change for Implementation (LOCI) strategy, in which leaders received training, coaching, and consultation to support implementation (k = 11). Six months after implementation strategies concluded, clinicians (N = 144) in both arms completed the Normalization MeAsure Development (NoMAD) questionnaire to describe the extent to which NPT mechanisms were enacted in their clinics. The primary outcome was a monthly, clinic-level, binary indicator of measurement-based care sustainment, derived from automatically-generated system usage data, for 16 months after the NoMAD assessment.
resultsThe NPT mechanisms were highly responsive to the organizational implementation strategy, which had a large effect overall (NoMAD total score: d
conclusionsThe generative mechanisms proposed by NPT are modifiable in response to theoretically-aligned implementation strategies, and greater enactment of these mechanisms predicts greater sustainment of complex health interventions over 16 months.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04096274 (Working to Implement and Sustain Digital Outcome Measures); Registered September 19, 2019; url: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/study/NCT04096274.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.