Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41656315›Full record

ArticleHuman genomics2026

Variant reclassification in cancer susceptibility genes and an updated variant spectrum of Turkish breast and colorectal cancer patients.

Nisan Denizce Can, Izzet Mehmet Akcay, Elifnaz Celik, Ceren Ciftci, Busra Unal, Nihat Bugra Agaoglu, Hamdi Levent Doganay, Gizem Dinler Doganay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nisan Denizce CanDepartment of Molecular Biology, Genetics and Biotechnology, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3810-6073
Izzet Mehmet AkcayMaurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6364-0062
Elifnaz CelikInstitute of Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology Basel (IOB), 4031, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0324-5228
Ceren CiftciDepartment of Molecular Biology, Genetics and Biotechnology, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-2228-5806
Busra UnalDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Division of Cancer Genetics, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Nihat Bugra AgaogluDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Division of Cancer Genetics, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9336-0552
Hamdi Levent DoganayGastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, VM Pendik Medicalpark Teaching Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2263-6689
Gizem Dinler DoganayDepartment of Molecular Biology, Genetics and Biotechnology, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey. gddoganay@itu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3586-1287

Funding

Istanbul Teknik Üniversitesi TGA-2022-43955Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu 1059B192100905Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu 318S127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multigene panel testing (MGPT) is a powerful tool for identifying pathogenic variants (PVs) underlying hereditary cancers. However, the clinical interpretation of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) remains a major challenge, particularly in populations underrepresented in population genomic databases. In this study, we analyzed 25 cancer susceptibility genes in a Turkish cohort comprising 1293 breast cancer (BC) patients, 370 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, and 914 cancer-free controls. Compared with our previous work, the expanded dataset enabled a more refined classification of germline variants. In total, we identified 217 distinct PVs and 494 distinct VUS. Among BC patients, PVs were enriched in BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, CHEK2, and ATM, while in CRC patients PVs were enriched in MLH1, MUTYH, MSH2, and CHEK2. Notably, CHEK2 was among the most frequently mutated genes, and harbored the highest number of distinct PVs and VUS per coding region. Given the underrepresentation of the Turkish population in public variant databases and the continuous accumulation of population and functional evidence, we systematically re-evaluated the 415 VUS reported 5 years ago in the initial freeze of this cohort. This reclassification resulted in 98 VUS being reclassified as benign and 16 as PVs, increasing positive test rates by 3.7% in BC patients and 1.6% in CRC patients, while reducing inconclusive results by approximately 9% across all study groups. Overall, this study underscores the importance of case–control design for population-specific variant interpretation and demonstrates how systematic reclassification can substantially enhance the clinical utility of MGPT. The findings contribute to improving hereditary cancer risk prediction in the Turkish population and have important implications for the development of future variant reclassification frameworks.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseAdultAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinCheckpoint Kinase 2DNA GlycosylasesFanconi Anemia Complementation Group N ProteinFemaleGerm-Line MutationHumansMiddle AgedMutL Protein Homolog 1MutS Homolog 2 ProteinAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATM protein, humanBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanCheckpoint Kinase 2CHEK2 protein, humanDNA GlycosylasesFanconi Anemia Complementation Group N ProteinMLH1 protein, humanMSH2 protein, humanMutL Protein Homolog 1MutS Homolog 2 ProteinmutY adenine glycosylasePALB2 protein, humanBreast cancerColorectal cancerHereditary cancer predispositionMultigene panel testingVariant reclassification

Identifiers

PMID41656315
PMCPMC12918020

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.