ArticleThe International journal of artificial organs2026
Theoretically redesigning peritoneal dialysis products for sustainability: A life cycle inventory approach.
Article in The International journal of artificial organs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a life-sustaining treatment for end-stage kidney disease but contributes significantly to environmental degradation due to its reliance on single-use plastics, energy-intensive manufacturing and high-volume transport. Redesigning PD products for sustainability is increasingly important as healthcare systems seek to reduce their carbon footprint. In this study, ten high-use peritoneal dialysis (PD) products were redesigned using life cycle thinking. Interventions included low-carbon transport (electric vans), renewable energy and improved waste treatment (pyrolysis). Life cycle inventories (LCIs) were modelled in Open Life Cycle Assessment (OpenLCA)and modelled using cradle-to-gate carbon footprints (kg CO₂-eq) to compare redesigned and conventional versions. All redesigned products achieved carbon footprint reductions, with eight showing decreases greater than 40%. The automated PD set and 2 L dialysate bag saw reductions of 63% and 54%, respectively (saving 1.15 and 0.86 kg CO2-eq per item). The APD machine achieved the largest percentage reduction at 87%, primarily driven by the elimination of printed packaging and the use of renewable electricity. Key contributors to emissions savings across products included lower-impact transport, sustainable packaging materials and circular waste strategies. Redesigning PD products using sustainable materials and processes can deliver substantial environmental benefits without compromising functionality. These findings support evidence-based pathways for reducing emissions in kidney care through product innovation and procurement reform.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.