Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41656705›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in gastroenterology2026

Irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea: time to change practice?

Cristina Caranfil, Luisa Bertin, Fabiana Zingone

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cristina CaranfilDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua.
Luisa BertinDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua.
Fabiana ZingoneDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTraditional approaches to irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) relied on extensive exclusionary testing and empiric symptom management. Recent advances in understanding neuroimmune pathophysiology, refined diagnostic algorithms, emergence of novel biomarkers, and clarification of comparative treatment efficacy through systematic reviews necessitate evaluation of whether accumulated evidence warrants substantive changes to contemporary diagnostic and therapeutic practice in IBS-D management. RECENT

findingsDiagnostic paradigms have shifted toward symptom-based approaches utilizing judicious testing informed by alarm features, with emerging biomarkers including neutrophil-to-albumin ratio, microRNA-148, and bile acid malabsorption markers showing promise. Therapeutically, tricyclic antidepressants demonstrate robust efficacy as neuromodulators, while selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors show limited benefit. Emerging neuroimmune therapies targeting mast cell activation, including histamine receptor antagonists, represent promising avenues. Low FODMAP and Mediterranean diets demonstrate substantial efficacy, while brain-gut behavioral therapies achieve clinically meaningful improvements in refractory populations through accessible delivery modalities. SUMMARY: Contemporary evidence supports fundamental practice shifts from exclusionary testing toward targeted investigation of treatable mimics and from empiric management toward mechanism-based multimodal interventions integrating neuromodulators, dietary modifications, and behavioral therapies. Optimal outcomes require individualized treatment selection informed by symptom phenotype and comorbidity profiles, ideally delivered through integrated care models combining gastroenterology, dietetic, and behavioral expertise.

Indexed as

DiarrheaIrritable Bowel SyndromeBiomarkersFODMAP DietHumansBiomarkerscognitive behavioral therapydietsdisorders of Gut-Brain interactionhypnotherapyneuromodulators

Identifiers

PMID41656705
PMCPMC13048311

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.