ReviewCurrent opinion in gastroenterology2026
Irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea: time to change practice?
Review in Current opinion in gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewTraditional approaches to irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) relied on extensive exclusionary testing and empiric symptom management. Recent advances in understanding neuroimmune pathophysiology, refined diagnostic algorithms, emergence of novel biomarkers, and clarification of comparative treatment efficacy through systematic reviews necessitate evaluation of whether accumulated evidence warrants substantive changes to contemporary diagnostic and therapeutic practice in IBS-D management. RECENT
findingsDiagnostic paradigms have shifted toward symptom-based approaches utilizing judicious testing informed by alarm features, with emerging biomarkers including neutrophil-to-albumin ratio, microRNA-148, and bile acid malabsorption markers showing promise. Therapeutically, tricyclic antidepressants demonstrate robust efficacy as neuromodulators, while selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors show limited benefit. Emerging neuroimmune therapies targeting mast cell activation, including histamine receptor antagonists, represent promising avenues. Low FODMAP and Mediterranean diets demonstrate substantial efficacy, while brain-gut behavioral therapies achieve clinically meaningful improvements in refractory populations through accessible delivery modalities. SUMMARY: Contemporary evidence supports fundamental practice shifts from exclusionary testing toward targeted investigation of treatable mimics and from empiric management toward mechanism-based multimodal interventions integrating neuromodulators, dietary modifications, and behavioral therapies. Optimal outcomes require individualized treatment selection informed by symptom phenotype and comorbidity profiles, ideally delivered through integrated care models combining gastroenterology, dietetic, and behavioral expertise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.