ArticleBrain injury2026
Scoping review of secondary studies using the Federal Interagency of Traumatic Brain Injury Research datasets.
Article in Brain injury, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTraumatic Brain Injury (TBI) affects hundreds of thousands of people in the United States each year and represents a significant public health problem. There is considerable heterogeneity of causes, diagnostic tools, treatments, and outcomes of TBI, and the volume of research on the topic reflects this. Despite the large body of research, significant gaps remain in our knowledge of how to diagnose and treat TBI. To address this, the Federal Interagency Traumatic Brain Injury Research (FITBIR) Informatics System was developed.
methodsThis scoping review aimed to provide a descriptive overview of how FITBIR data has been used in published research since its inception, including the types of studies conducted, datasets used, and methodological approaches. Online databases were used to identify papers that utilized FITBIR data for secondary applications.
resultsForty-nine articles were identified for inclusion through a literature search. We summarize the secondary uses of FITBIR data, focusing on how many and which data sets were used, as well as the varied approaches to data use.
conclusionsThis review demonstrates successful use of existing TBI data to expand the knowledge base regarding diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes, and suggests promising potential for future harmonization and synthesis of available datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.