ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Beyond cardiac risk factors: non-cardiovascular comorbidities in sudden cardiac death prediction.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Modifiable lifestyle factors and sudden cardiac death: mechanisms, evidence, and prevention strategies.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) causes 180,000-360,000 annual deaths in the United States, with mortality rates exceeding 90%. Despite advances in resuscitation science, predicting SCD remains challenging due to inconsistent definitions, subtle warning signs, and temporal variability in risk factors. While traditional cardiovascular conditions are well-integrated into risk prediction models, non-cardiovascular comorbidities remain significantly underutilized despite contributing to nearly 40% of SCD cases. This review examines evidence linking various systemic conditions to SCD risk. Neurologic disorders including epilepsy (1.6-5.89-fold increased risk), depression (1.6-2.7-fold), and anxiety (1.6-fold) elevate SCD vulnerability through autonomic dysregulation and medication effects. Respiratory conditions like COPD (1.3-3.6-fold) and obstructive sleep apnea (1.6-2.6-fold) contribute through chronic hypoxemia and inflammation. Hepatic pathology, kidney disease, anemia, and endocrine disorders (particularly diabetes with 1.7-2.4-fold risk) also demonstrate significant associations. Critically, non-cardiovascular comorbidities predict not only SCD occurrence but also initial cardiac rhythm presentation-essential for determining implantable cardioverter-defibrillator candidates, as these devices only benefit shockable rhythms. Conditions like epilepsy, depression, COPD, liver cirrhosis, and chronic kidney disease correlate with predominantly non-shockable presentations. Current prediction models incorporate few non-cardiac conditions, primarily due to historical cardiac-centric approaches, sample size constraints, complex disease interactions, and overfitting concerns. Proposed solutions include multidisciplinary research collaboration, multicenter data pooling, and advanced machine learning techniques to develop more comprehensive and accurate SCD prediction algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.