Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41657617›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Software system for implant positioning with guided surgery: An

Shyni Rani Gorremutchu, Sampath Anche, Krishna Mohan Thota, Nayeema Sultana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shyni Rani GorremutchuDepartment of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge Including Implantology, SIBAR Institute of Dental Sciences, Takkellapdu, Guntur Andhra Pradesh 522509, India.
Sampath AncheDepartment of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge Including Implantology, SIBAR Institute of Dental Sciences, Takkellapdu, Guntur Andhra Pradesh 522509, India.
Krishna Mohan ThotaDepartment of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge Including Implantology, SIBAR Institute of Dental Sciences, Takkellapdu, Guntur Andhra Pradesh 522509, India.
Nayeema SultanaDepartment of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge Including Implantology, SIBAR Institute of Dental Sciences, Takkellapdu, Guntur Andhra Pradesh 522509, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate implant positioning is critical for the long-term success of dental rehabilitation, yet variations among computer-guided surgery software systems can affect precision. Therefore, it is of interest to compare the accuracy of two implant planning software systems, Exocad and Blueskybio, in guided implant placement. A total of 104 implants were placed in 52 patients using fully guided templates, and postoperative CBCTs were analyzed for angular, depth, and horizontal deviations from preoperative plans. Software System A demonstrated significantly lower angular and linear deviations than Software System B, indicating superior positional accuracy. Thus, we show the importance of selecting precise planning software to ensure optimal implant placement and improved clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

accuracyCBCTdental implantsguided surgeryImplant positioningin vivo studysoftware comparisonsurgical guide

Identifiers

PMID41657617
PMCPMC12880171

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.