Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41657988›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025

Xiaomin Duan, Shilong Li, Yan Li, Zihao Yang, Xiumin Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiaomin Duan *College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei, China.
Shilong Li *College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei, China.
Yan LiCollege of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei, China.
Zihao YangCollege of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei, China.
Xiumin ZhangCollege of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lycopene, a vital antioxidant, can reduce oxidative damage to cells caused by reactive oxygen, prevent cancer, lower blood cholesterol levels, and mitigate cardiovascular diseases. We screened a lycopene-producing strain of the genus Method: This study was conducted to enhance lycopene production in strain A560 through a multi-stage optimization strategy, focusing on improving extraction efficiency and optimizing culture medium components. The extraction conditions were optimized by testing different solvent systems (acetone/n-hexane/ethanol), extraction temperatures, and durations. Subsequently, a uniform design (UD) was applied to systematically optimize the composition of the culture medium to maximize lycopene yield. Results: The extraction conditions were systematically optimized. A crushing duration of 4 min was identified as optimal for complete cell disruption. The most efficient solvent system was determined to be n-hexane/ethanol (2:1, Conclusion: The extraction and fermentation processes for lycopene production in

Indexed as

extracting conditionslycopeneoptimization of culture mediumPolymorphospora lycopeni A560Va/Vm ratios

Identifiers

PMID41657988
PMCPMC12872836

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.