Evidence mapPaperPMID 41658295Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2025

Risk factors for postpartum depression: an umbrella review.

Min Xu, Yuting Luo, Yuehua Huang, Yunxia Liu, Lingling Ding

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. "Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Min XuObstetrics and Gynecology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuting LuoObstetrics and Gynecology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuehua HuangObstetrics and Gynecology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yunxia LiuObstetrics and Gynecology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Lingling DingObstetrics and Gynecology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This umbrella review aimed to systematically evaluate and synthesize the evidence on risk factors associated with postpartum depression (PPD), assess the methodological quality and credibility of the existing meta-analyses, and identify high-priority targets for prevention and intervention. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Medicine up to March 2025 for systematic reviews and meta-analyses reporting on risk factors for PPD. Eligible studies were appraised using AMSTAR-2 and GRADE frameworks. Risk factors were categorized based on effect estimates, heterogeneity, publication bias, and evidence strength. Results: Seventy-seven meta-analyses were included, covering 53 unique risk factors. Among these, 40 showed statistically significant associations with PPD. Unintended pregnancy (OR: 1.55), intimate partner violence (OR: 2.50), poor social support (RR: 3.57), sleep disorders (OR: 2.36), and history of depression (OR: 3.09) emerged as the strongest risk factors. Protective factors included postpartum physical activity (SMD: -0.42), doula support (RR: 0.36), breastfeeding support (MD: -2.11), and parenting interventions (SMD: -0.34). Most evidence was rated as low or very low in certainty; only a few outcomes based on randomized controlled trials were graded as moderate to high quality. Conclusions: PPD is influenced by a broad spectrum of psychosocial, biological, and obstetric risk factors. Although many associations are supported by statistical significance, the overall evidence quality remains suboptimal. Targeted screening and preventive strategies should prioritize high-risk groups, while future research should focus on high-quality, prospective studies to establish causal links and improve maternal mental health outcomes. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO (Registration No.: CRD420251249033).

Indexed as

Depression, PostpartumFemaleHumansPregnancyRisk FactorsSocial Supportevidencepostpartum depressionpreventive strategiesrisk factorsumbrella review

Identifiers

PMID41658295
PMCPMC12872911

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.