ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2026
Comparative predictive performance of three machine learning algorithms for acute radiation enteritis risk among patients with cervical cancer undergoing radiotherapy: A prospective cohort study.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Microbiome-Driven Risk Stratification and Biotherapeutics in Radiation Enteritis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop a machine learning-based risk prediction model for acute radiation enteritis (ARE) in patients with cervical cancer, providing a new method for early and accurate prediction of ARE during radiotherapy. Methods: This prospective study enrolled patients with cervical cancer undergoing radiotherapy from March 2024 to March 2025. The patients were randomly divided into training and test sets at a 7:3 ratio. Prediction models were constructed using Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT), and Random Forest (RF) algorithms. Model performance was evaluated based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score. Results: The incidence of ARE was 52.85% (204/386). Among the three models, the Random Forest model demonstrated the best performance, with an AUC of 0.961, sensitivity of 0.934, and F1-score of 0.905. These performance metrics were consistently higher than those of the LR (AUC, 0.860; sensitivity, 0.739; F1-score, 0.736) and DT (AUC, 0.910; sensitivity, 0.887; F1-score, 0.873) models. The RF model showed good clinical utility in effectively identifying high-risk patients for early intervention. Feature importance ranking derived from the RF model identified the parametrial dose, radiotherapy time, clinical stage, rectal V40, age, Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR), concurrent chemotherapy, and hypertension as the most influential predictors, in descending order of importance. Conclusions: The RF-based risk prediction model exhibited excellent performance in assessing the risk of ARE among patients with cervical cancer undergoing radiotherapy, thereby enabling individualized risk assessment and facilitating early preventive strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.