Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41658474›Full record

ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2026

Comparative predictive performance of three machine learning algorithms for acute radiation enteritis risk among patients with cervical cancer undergoing radiotherapy: A prospective cohort study.

Zhao Wang, Huiying Liu, Xiaocen Chen, Fang Zhang, Yixuan Liu, Jiayun Sun, Lili Liu, Xiaotong Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Microbiome-Driven Risk Stratification and Biotherapeutics in Radiation Enteritis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhao WangDepartment of Radiotherapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China.
Huiying LiuDepartment of Radiotherapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China.
Xiaocen ChenDepartment of Radiotherapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China.
Fang ZhangDepartment of Radiotherapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China.
Yixuan LiuDepartment of Radiotherapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China.
Jiayun SunDepartment of Radiotherapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China.
Lili LiuDepartment of Radiotherapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China.
Xiaotong YangGraduate School, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To develop a machine learning-based risk prediction model for acute radiation enteritis (ARE) in patients with cervical cancer, providing a new method for early and accurate prediction of ARE during radiotherapy. Methods: This prospective study enrolled patients with cervical cancer undergoing radiotherapy from March 2024 to March 2025. The patients were randomly divided into training and test sets at a 7:3 ratio. Prediction models were constructed using Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT), and Random Forest (RF) algorithms. Model performance was evaluated based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score. Results: The incidence of ARE was 52.85% (204/386). Among the three models, the Random Forest model demonstrated the best performance, with an AUC of 0.961, sensitivity of 0.934, and F1-score of 0.905. These performance metrics were consistently higher than those of the LR (AUC, 0.860; sensitivity, 0.739; F1-score, 0.736) and DT (AUC, 0.910; sensitivity, 0.887; F1-score, 0.873) models. The RF model showed good clinical utility in effectively identifying high-risk patients for early intervention. Feature importance ranking derived from the RF model identified the parametrial dose, radiotherapy time, clinical stage, rectal V40, age, Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR), concurrent chemotherapy, and hypertension as the most influential predictors, in descending order of importance. Conclusions: The RF-based risk prediction model exhibited excellent performance in assessing the risk of ARE among patients with cervical cancer undergoing radiotherapy, thereby enabling individualized risk assessment and facilitating early preventive strategies.

Indexed as

Acute radiation enteritisCervical cancerMachine learningRandom forestRisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID41658474
PMCPMC12874331

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.