Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41658540›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Providing maceration protocols for xylem and phloem research.

Eunice Romero, Mark Olson, Alí Segovia-Rivas, Jarmila Pittermann, Radek Jupa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eunice RomeroDepartment of Physical Geography and Geoecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Mark OlsonBiology Institute, Botany Department, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.
Alí Segovia-RivasBiology Institute, Botany Department, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.
Jarmila PittermannDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, United States.
Radek JupaDepartment of Experimental Biology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maceration technique allows isolating and studying the structure of plant cells, providing essential insights into plant physiology and responses to environmental factors. Despite its importance, the methods sections of publications often lack sufficient detail to properly apply maceration technique, preventing broader applications beyond industrial and wood identification studies. Here we describe maceration protocols (P), as guidelines, to allow successful cell separation, in woody and herbaceous plants, for further studying the structure of vascular tissues (xylem and phloem), using Franklin's solution instead of the traditional, more toxic Jeffrey's. We included sample preparation, equipment and chemicals, recommended stains and means of slide preparation that ensure clear observation and imaging, and identified potential pitfalls and safety practices. P1 provides a simple xylem and phloem maceration technique, with non-permanent slides preparation, suitable for observation under light, fluorescence or confocal microscopy. P2 and P3 are suitable for producing permanent slides of macerated xylem cells. P2 has been successfully used for macerating xylem of angiosperms and gymnosperms from at least 34 families and 25 orders, with densities ranging widely. P3 uses minimal substances and time for dehydration and staining. These flexible protocols may contribute to unlocking the potential of maceration technique to advance research in ecology and evolution.

Indexed as

allometryconduit diameterdissociatesJeffreyquantitative wood anatomysieve tube elementstracheid and vessel length

Identifiers

PMID41658540
PMCPMC12872850

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.