Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41658591›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

A clinically significant interaction between voriconazole and rifapentine: a case report and review of evidence.

Tingting Chen, Xiaoling Chen, Qingquan Zhang

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tingting ChenDepartment of Pharmacy, Quanzhou First Hospital, Quanzhou, Fujian, China.
Xiaoling ChenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Quanzhou First Hospital, Quanzhou, Fujian, China.
Qingquan ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, Quanzhou First Hospital, Quanzhou, Fujian, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a case of concurrent pulmonary aspergillosis and tuberculosis in a 53-year-old male, treated with voriconazole and rifapentine. In this case, co-administration with rifapentine resulted in a markedly lower voriconazole trough concentration (0.4 μg/mL on day 7) compared to that without it (4.3 μg/mL on day 25), reflecting a 90.7% reduction. After rifapentine was discontinued and the voriconazole dose was increased to 300 mg q12h intravenously (day 8), the trough concentration remained at 0.4 μg/mL two days later (day 10). Subsequently, it increased to 3.0 μg/mL by day 14 (6 days post-adjustment) and further rose to 10.8 μg/mL by day 18 (10 days post-adjustment), exceeding the therapeutic range. The results demonstrated a significant decrease in voriconazole levels during combination therapy, an effect that persisted for over one week after rifapentine was discontinued. This case illustrates that increasing the voriconazole dose immediately after rifapentine cessation is not advisable to counteract this interaction. Furthermore, therapeutic drug monitoring should be continued even after target trough levels are attained, as the waning enzyme-induction effect may subsequently lead to supra-therapeutic exposure and potential toxicity.

Indexed as

drug–drug interactionrifapentinetherapeutic drug monitoringtuberculosisvoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID41658591
PMCPMC12875967

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.