ReviewCureus2026
Long-Term Cardiovascular Outcomes of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Non-diabetic Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dietary Interventions for Hypertriglyceridemia.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2026Review
- Real-World vs. Randomized Trial Evidence for Incretin-Based Therapies: A Narrative Review.Journal of diabetes · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) demonstrate cardiovascular benefits in diabetic populations, yet evidence in non-diabetic obesity remains limited. We searched PubMed, Excerpta Medica database (Embase), Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science (January 2015-January 2025) for randomized controlled trials evaluating GLP-1 RAs in non-diabetic adults with obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m²), with composite major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) as the primary outcome using random-effects models with risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Sixteen trials (23,467 participants, median 68 weeks follow-up) were included, demonstrating that GLP-1 RAs reduced MACE by 20% (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.72-0.89), with strongest effects on stroke (RR 0.72), myocardial infarction (RR 0.84), and heart failure hospitalization (RR 0.82), alongside reductions in systolic blood pressure (4.2 mmHg), triglycerides (32 mg/dL), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) (38.6%), with 12.4% weight loss where mediation analyses showed 35%-55% of cardiovascular benefit was independent of weight reduction. GLP-1 RAs provide substantial cardiovascular protection in non-diabetic obesity through both weight loss-dependent and independent mechanisms, with acceptable safety profiles supporting their role in cardiovascular risk reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.