ArticleCureus2026
Surgical Techniques for a Parasitic Myoma Fed by the Mesentery: A Case Report and Technical Discussion.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parasitic myoma (PM) is a rare form of leiomyoma that detaches from the uterus and acquires a blood supply from other organs. While often iatrogenic following power morcellation, primary spontaneous PM can occur. We present a surgical case of a PM fed by the mesentery, likely resulting from inflammatory adhesions following a previous small bowel ileus. A 33-year-old nulliparous woman with no history of prior surgeries underwent laparoscopic myomectomy for a suspected subserosal myoma. Intraoperatively, we encountered a PM with a significant vascular supply extending from the mesentery to the uterine wall. The tumor was firmly adherent to the gastrointestinal tract. We examined the technical management of high-risk vascular adhesions. Key maneuvers included: (1) injection of vasopressin strictly on the uterine side of the attachment to avoid compromising mesenteric blood flow; (2) precise identification of the dissection plane; and (3) meticulous dissection alternating between monopolar excision and blunt separation to preserve the bowel integrity. The tumor was successfully detached, and the feeding vessels were coagulated. A containment bag was used during morcellation to prevent iatrogenic seeding. Operative time was 145 minutes with no bowel injury. This case highlights that PM should be considered even in patients without prior gynecologic surgery if there is a history of intra-abdominal inflammation. Careful identification of dissection planes and management of feeding vessels are critical for safe laparoscopic management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.