Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41659014›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025

Ex-PALM: a negative pressure ventilation system for air leak evaluation in

Mark Vartazarmian, Alexandre Abid, Rodin Chermat, Maxime Têtu, Luciano Bulgarelli Maqueda, Arman Sarshoghi, Saman Naghieh, Delphine Périé, Moishe Liberman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mark VartazarmianDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Alexandre AbidTID Laboratory, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada.
Rodin ChermatTID Laboratory, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada.
Maxime TêtuTID Laboratory, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada.
Luciano Bulgarelli MaquedaTID Laboratory, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada.
Arman SarshoghiTID Laboratory, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada.
Saman NaghiehTID Laboratory, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada.
Delphine PériéDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Moishe LibermanTID Laboratory, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Prolonged air leaks (PAL) are considered to be one of the leading causes of postoperative complications following lung surgery. There are currently no clinically relevant methods for efficiently and systematically evaluating the underlying causes of PAL. Here, we introduce a new intuitive, physiologically-representative system for Methods: Reproducibility and system capabilities were assessed using a lung simulation model capable of controlling the effective area of the defect, then validated with Results: Our system enables dynamic control of ventilation using either pressure (PCV) or volume (VCV) targets, with respective standard deviations of ±0.08 cm H2O and ±2.1 mL with moderate air leaks (<1,000 mL/min) and respective standard deviations of ±0.18 cm H2O and ±11 mL with severe air leaks (>1,000 mL/min). Additionally, leak quantification features proved comparable to that of the Thopaz+ (Medela Healthcare, Baar, Switzerland), a standard commercial digital thoracic drainage system, offering sufficient resolution to differentiate among clinically relevant air leaks. In the lower leak ranges (<400 mL/min) across all methods of evaluations, there were no significant differences between measured leak rates. For higher leak ranges, although there remained no significant differences between the Ex-PALM methods evaluated, the Discussion: The

Indexed as

air leakcoughex vivolung modelnegative pressure ventilatorthoracic surgerytissue mechanics

Identifiers

PMID41659014
PMCPMC12872819

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.