ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Ex-PALM: a negative pressure ventilation system for air leak evaluation in
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Prolonged air leaks (PAL) are considered to be one of the leading causes of postoperative complications following lung surgery. There are currently no clinically relevant methods for efficiently and systematically evaluating the underlying causes of PAL. Here, we introduce a new intuitive, physiologically-representative system for Methods: Reproducibility and system capabilities were assessed using a lung simulation model capable of controlling the effective area of the defect, then validated with Results: Our system enables dynamic control of ventilation using either pressure (PCV) or volume (VCV) targets, with respective standard deviations of ±0.08 cm H2O and ±2.1 mL with moderate air leaks (<1,000 mL/min) and respective standard deviations of ±0.18 cm H2O and ±11 mL with severe air leaks (>1,000 mL/min). Additionally, leak quantification features proved comparable to that of the Thopaz+ (Medela Healthcare, Baar, Switzerland), a standard commercial digital thoracic drainage system, offering sufficient resolution to differentiate among clinically relevant air leaks. In the lower leak ranges (<400 mL/min) across all methods of evaluations, there were no significant differences between measured leak rates. For higher leak ranges, although there remained no significant differences between the Ex-PALM methods evaluated, the Discussion: The
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.