ArticleDigital health
Understanding the telehealth access through an intersectional lens: Experience of Mandarin-speaking consumers accessing health services from a tertiary hospital in Australia.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mandarin-speaking consumers requiring interpreter services face significant barriers to telehealth access in Australia, often due to systemic and cultural disconnects which widens healthcare access disparities. This qualitative cross-cultural cross-lingual study explored the perspectives of Mandarin-speaking individuals at a metropolitan hospital in Queensland to identify barriers, enablers, and solutions for equitable telehealth access. Methods: Three Mandarin cross-lingual focus groups were conducted. Situated within the interpretive research paradigm and informed by intersectional critical inquiry, consumers described their perspectives on lived experiences interacting with the tertiary healthcare system while accessing telehealth and requiring interpreter services. Analysis was conducted by two researchers, starting with open coding, cross-checking and application of an intersectional lens. Results: Eight Mandarin-speaking consumers and two carers attended three cross-lingual focus groups with qualified real-time interpreters. The analysis revealed six themes: 1) lack of telehealth awareness; 2) clinicians are gatekeepers of telehealth services; 3) the healthcare system is monolingual; 4) navigating the healthcare system is disempowering; 5) power is transferred to interpreters and carers; and 6) alternative solutions do not align with participants needs. Participants expressed openness to telehealth but emphasised the need for culturally sensitive and clearly communicated options. Conclusion: This study reveals significant challenges accessing telehealth for Mandarin-speaking consumers needing interpreter services in metropolitan Queensland and highlights that clinician assumptions and the monolingual nature of healthcare services as major barriers. While video interpreting is often recommended, participants preferred simple, safe, and culturally appropriate communication strategies. Co-designing telehealth solutions with multicultural consumers can prevent the deepening of existing inequities and to foster inclusive healthcare practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.