Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41659359›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2025

Hair care product use among pregnant women of color: protocol for a feasibility educational intervention.

Felice Tsui, Chrystelle L Vilfranc, Adana A M Llanos, Lauren C Houghton, Jamirra Franklin, Vaishnavi More, Katherine E Manz, Kurt D Pennell, Mary Beth Terry, Peggy Shepard and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04493892 (Hair Care Product Use Among Women Of Color), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04493892 nacompletednot on this map

Hair Care Product Use Among Women Of Color: A Northern Manhattan Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorColumbia UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled46ConditionsBreast Cancer, Pregnancy Related, Exposure During PregnancyArmsEducational Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Felice Tsui *Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Chrystelle L Vilfranc *Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Adana A M LlanosDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Lauren C HoughtonDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Jamirra FranklinDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Vaishnavi MoreDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Katherine E ManzSchool of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
Kurt D PennellSchool of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
Mary Beth TerryDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Peggy ShepardWE ACT for Environmental Justice, New York, NY, United States.
Emily BarrettDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, United States.
Desiree A H WalkerYoung Survival Coalition, New York, NY, United States.
Jasmine A McDonaldDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) disrupt hormonal regulation and pose health risks. Phthalates, common in personal care products, contribute to disparate chemical exposures among different demographic groups, notably impacting critical life stages like pregnancy and postpartum. Objective: Using an environmental health literacy framework, we designed an educational intervention for pregnant Women of Color to highlight the health risks of phthalates in hair care products. The intervention aimed to measure behavioral changes toward phthalate-free products through self-reporting and urinary phthalate metabolite levels and explore factors influencing hair care practices during pregnancy. Methods: In collaboration with multidisciplinary academicians, environmental health, and breast cancer advocates, we developed a virtual educational intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic. Components included a facilitated presentation, an educational video, and a semi-structured interview guide that was refined through feedback. Data collection involved baseline and follow-up sessions, sociodemographic data, hair product usage, behavior related to phthalate-containing products, and urine sample collection. To provide proof of methodological principle, we examined individual change over time from questionnaire data and targeted exposomics analysis of urinary phthalate compounds among women with baseline and follow-up data. Results: Educational materials were developed in English and Spanish. Enrollment occurred from March 2021 to June 2022, involving participants in the second or third trimester of pregnancy. Women enrolled before 31 weeks gestation, completed a baseline assessment and at least one follow-up assessment, while those at ≥31 weeks gestation completed a baseline assessment and one postpartum follow-up assessment. Forty-six participants enrolled, with 31 completing the intervention, and 42 urine samples collected. Women who completed the educational intervention were slightly older than those women who did not attend an intervention session [mean age (SD) 31.0 (5.8) vs. 27.5 (5.4)], respectively. Product and brand use decreased over time, and portions of participants exhibited reductions in six different low molecular weight phthalate metabolites (27%-73% reductions). Significance: This intervention was shaped by a collaborative effort that ensured its cultural relevance, linguistic inclusivity, and alignment with community needs, amplifying its potential impact on reducing the unequal burden of environmental exposures in marginalized communities. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04493892.

Indexed as

educational interventionendocrine disruptorsenvironmental health literacyhair care productsmaternal exposurespopulation healthpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID41659359
PMCPMC12872876

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.